პოლონეთმა უკრაინის ტერიტორიაზე რუსეთის თავდასხმის გამო ავიაცია გაააქტიურა. 

Detected Manipulations & Suggested Changes

Omission of key information

Leaving out relevant contextual or opposing information that could help readers fully understand the situation.

The article states that Poland activated aviation and air defense systems "რუსეთის მიერ უკრაინის რეგიონებზე თავდასხმის საპასუხოდ" (in response to Russia's attacks on Ukrainian regions) and that Romania detected an aerial target near its border, but it does not include any Russian official statement or explanation about the attacks, nor any Ukrainian official reaction. It also does not specify what type of aerial target was detected near Romania or whether debris or other material consequences were found.

4 suggestions

Add brief, sourced information on Russia’s official position or statement regarding the specific attacks on Ukrainian regions, if available, clearly attributing it (e.g., "რუსეთის თავდაცვის სამინისტროს განცხადებით…").

Include any available Ukrainian official reaction or casualty/damage information, with clear attribution (e.g., "უკრაინის მხარის ცნობით…").

Provide more detail, if known and verified, about the "საჰაერო სამიზნე" detected near Romania (e.g., whether it was assessed as a drone, missile, or debris) and whether any physical remnants were found on Romanian territory.

Clarify whether the suspension of operations at Lublin and Rzeszów airports was temporary and how long it lasted, if that information is available from official sources.

Unbalanced reporting

Presenting one side’s actions and perspectives more fully than others, even without overtly biased language.

The article gives operational and justificatory detail for Poland and Romania (activation of aviation, air defense, radar systems, airport closures, and a direct quote from the Polish Armed Forces Operational Command). Russia is only mentioned as the attacker, with no Russian-side sourcing or description beyond that it attacked Ukrainian regions. Ukraine is mentioned only as the territory under attack, without Ukrainian sources or perspectives. This creates an information asymmetry: NATO-aligned states’ defensive measures are described in detail and with direct quotes, while the attacking side and the attacked side are not represented through their own statements.

4 suggestions

Add at least one short, clearly attributed Russian official statement or prior claim related to the attacks, if available, making clear that it reflects Russia’s position and not established fact.

Include a Ukrainian official statement or data (e.g., about the scale or impact of the attacks) to represent the perspective of the country under attack.

Explicitly note when attempts to obtain comment from Russian or Ukrainian officials were unsuccessful (e.g., "რუსეთის მხარემ კომენტარი არ გააკეთა"), if that is the case, to show that the absence of their voice is not due to editorial choice alone.

Maintain the same level of detail and attribution for all sides’ claims, clearly distinguishing between verified facts (e.g., airport closures, aircraft launches) and claims or interpretations by any party.