Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Ukrainian authorities / Ukrainian media account of the attack
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Presenting information from only one side or a narrow set of sources, without indicating whether other perspectives or confirmations exist.
The article relies solely on Ukrainian media and the head of the Kharkiv regional state administration, Oleg Synegubov, as sources: "ინფორმაციას უკრაინული მედია ავრცელებს." and "ხარკოვის რეგიონული- სახელმწიფო ადმინისტრაციის ხელმძღვანელის, ოლეგ სინეგუბოვის ცნობით..." There is no mention of independent verification (e.g., international organizations, independent observers) or whether the Russian side was asked for comment.
Explicitly indicate the sourcing and its limits, e.g.: "ინფორმაციას უკრაინული მედია ავრცელებს, რომელიც ეყრდნობა ხარკოვის რეგიონული სახელმწიფო ადმინისტრაციის ხელმძღვანელის, ოლეგ სინეგუბოვის განცხადებას. ინფორმაცია დამოუკიდებელი წყაროებით ამ ეტაპზე დამატებით არ არის დადასტურებული."
Add whether attempts were made to obtain comment from the Russian side, even if they did not respond, e.g.: "რუსულ მხარესთან კომენტარისთვის დაკავშირება ვერ მოხერხდა" or "რუსულ მხარეს ამ დარტყმის შესახებ საჯარო კომენტარი ამ დროისთვის არ გაუკეთებია."
If available, include corroboration from independent or third-party sources (e.g., OSCE, UN, international media, satellite imagery) to reduce reliance on a single national source.
Leaving out relevant contextual information that would help readers fully understand the event.
The article states that Russian forces struck a residential building and another district (Kyivskyi district of the city) but provides no additional context: no mention of the broader military situation in Kharkiv, whether there were any claimed military targets nearby, or whether this fits into a pattern of similar attacks. While brevity is normal for a news brief, the lack of any context can oversimplify a complex wartime event.
Add one or two sentences of neutral context, e.g.: "ხარკოვი ბოლო თვეების განმავლობაში არაერთხელ გამხდარა სარაკეტო და საარტილერიო დარტყმების სამიზნე, რის შედეგადაც ხშირად ზიანდება სამოქალაქო ინფრასტრუქტურა."
Clarify what is known and unknown, e.g.: "ამ ეტაპზე უცნობია, იყო თუ არა საცხოვრებელი კორპუსის მახლობლად სამხედრო ობიექტი."
If available, include information on prior similar incidents or relevant international reactions (e.g., statements from UN or human rights organizations) in a factual, non-emotive way.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.