Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Companies/markets described positively (gainers, strong results, suitors, etc.)
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Using slightly value-laden or promotional wording that can subtly frame developments as more positive or exciting than a strictly neutral description would.
Phrases such as: - "clawed back Monday’s decline" (suggests a struggle or comeback rather than simply stating the index rose after a prior fall) - "Riding high" as a section header (implies strong positive momentum, a mildly celebratory tone) - "The medical device maker provided a strong tailwind for the NZX 50" (metaphorical, slightly promotional framing of F&P Healthcare’s impact) These do not distort facts but add a light narrative/emotional layer to otherwise factual reporting.
Replace "clawed back Monday’s decline" with a more neutral phrase such as "reversed Monday’s decline" or "rose after Monday’s decline".
Change the section header "Riding high" to a neutral label like "Market performance" or "Index movements".
Replace "provided a strong tailwind for the NZX 50" with "contributed significantly to the NZX 50’s gain" or "was a major contributor to the NZX 50’s rise".
Imposing a narrative or storyline (e.g., comeback, rally, chasing deals) on a set of data points, which can imply causality or coherence beyond what the data strictly support.
Examples include: - The title and opening framing: "NZX 50 rallies as F&P Healthcare tests new highs". While factually correct, it implicitly links the index rally to F&P Healthcare’s performance as a central narrative driver, even though multiple stocks and sectors are mentioned as contributors. - Subheading "Chasing deals" for the section on Heartland, SkyCity, and THL, which frames disparate corporate actions under a single deal-chasing storyline. These are common in market reporting and not misleading here, but they do lightly shape a narrative.
Clarify the multi-factor nature of the index move, e.g., "NZX 50 rises, helped by F&P Healthcare testing new highs" instead of implying a single dominant cause.
Change the subheading "Chasing deals" to a more descriptive and neutral phrase such as "M&A and corporate activity".
Where multiple factors are at play, explicitly note that the index move reflects a range of stock-specific developments rather than a single narrative driver.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.