Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Product/Collaboration (Billy van Creamy & Acide)
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Using wording that nudges the reader’s emotional reaction or frames the product as edgy or controversial rather than neutrally describing it.
1) "2025 was supposed to be the year of the pickle. But 2026 is coming for the title, with ice-cream shop Billy van Creamy and Melbourne-based preserves company Acide teaming up on a sure-to-be divisive dill pickle sorbet." This frames the product as part of a trend and labels it "sure-to-be divisive" without evidence (no quotes from customers, no survey, etc.). It primes the reader to see the product as controversial. 2) "If that still sounds too gnarly for you, the duo also teamed up on a sweeter, fruity number..." "Too gnarly" is a colloquial, emotionally loaded phrase that assumes a negative reaction and plays into a playful, slightly sensational framing rather than neutral description.
Replace "sure-to-be divisive dill pickle sorbet" with a more neutral description such as: "a dill pickle sorbet that some people may find unusual" or "a dill pickle sorbet that may not appeal to everyone."
Remove the trend-like framing "2025 was supposed to be the year of the pickle. But 2026 is coming for the title" or rephrase it as a clearly subjective, light remark, e.g.: "Pickle-flavoured foods have been popular recently, and this year brings a new example: a dill pickle sorbet..."
Change "If that still sounds too gnarly for you" to a neutral alternative such as: "If that doesn’t appeal to you" or "If you prefer something more traditional" to avoid implying that disliking the flavour is extreme or that the flavour itself is inherently off-putting.
Optionally add a brief, factual note about reactions (if available), e.g.: "Some customers describe it as refreshing, while others prefer the sweeter option," to ground the idea of divisiveness in actual responses rather than assumption.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.