Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Festival / Organisers
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Use of enthusiastic or hype-like language to make content seem more exciting or important than neutrally warranted.
Phrases such as: - "What is 'truth'? The question is enough to have many of us reaching for an aspirin." - "we’re hoping to get to the bottom of that headache-inducing question" - "beloved local legends like Trent Dalton and Madeleine Gray" - "the wildly successful Apple TV show Slow Horses" These are stylistic, promotional or dramatic flourishes rather than neutral descriptions.
Replace "The question is enough to have many of us reaching for an aspirin" with a neutral description such as "The question is complex and widely debated."
Replace "we’re hoping to get to the bottom of that headache-inducing question" with "the festival will explore this question in depth."
Replace "beloved local legends like Trent Dalton and Madeleine Gray" with "local authors such as Trent Dalton and Madeleine Gray" or provide evidence for their popularity (e.g., awards, sales figures).
Replace "the wildly successful Apple TV show Slow Horses" with a more specific, verifiable description such as "the Apple TV show Slow Horses, which has received positive reviews and multiple seasons."
Relying on the prestige or status of well-known figures to imply importance or credibility without explaining their specific relevance.
The article lists high-profile figures (e.g., "former New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern and Wikipedia co-founder Jimmy Wales") as "Global changemakers" to signal the significance of the festival and its discussions, without detailing their specific contributions to the topics mentioned.
Clarify the specific expertise or contributions of each figure to the topics discussed, e.g., "Jacinda Ardern, who led New Zealand through [specific events], will discuss trust and leadership in politics."
Avoid value-laden labels like "Global changemakers" unless accompanied by concrete examples or evidence of their impact.
Present the speakers simply by role and topic, e.g., "Jacinda Ardern and Jimmy Wales will discuss the changing nature of trust, power and politics."
Use of positive evaluative terms that implicitly endorse people or works without supporting evidence.
Examples include: - "beloved local legends like Trent Dalton and Madeleine Gray" - "one of Australia’s favourite cookbooks" (about The Cook’s Companion) - "the wildly successful Apple TV show Slow Horses" These phrases present subjective judgments as if they were broadly accepted facts.
Qualify subjective terms or attribute them clearly, e.g., "often described as" or "widely regarded as" and, where possible, reference awards, sales, or surveys.
Replace "beloved local legends" with "well-known local authors" unless specific evidence of their status is provided.
Replace "one of Australia’s favourite cookbooks" with a more precise claim such as "a bestselling Australian cookbook first published in [year]."
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.