Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Experiment description / Author & project
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Leaving out relevant details that would help readers fully understand or evaluate the claims.
The article states that the neural network wrote game code based on the dog's key presses and that the author set a context for the model, but it does not specify: - What exact prompts/context were used. - What kind of game was produced or how functional it was. - Any evaluation of whether the result was coherent or mostly random. This omission does not appear deceptive, but it limits the reader’s ability to assess how meaningful the experiment’s outcome was.
Add a brief description of the resulting game: its genre, basic mechanics, and whether it was playable or coherent.
Include at least one example of the prompt/context sent to the model so readers can judge how much structure came from the human vs. the dog’s key presses.
Clarify whether the author considered the result a success, partial success, or mainly a playful demonstration, and on what basis that judgment was made.
Implying something is impressive or important mainly because it is new or unusual, without clearly stating its limitations.
The title and lead describe that a dog "created a game" using a neural network. While the body clarifies that the dog pressed keys and the model generated code, the framing can suggest a stronger creative role for the dog than is technically accurate. This is a mild form of novelty appeal rather than strong sensationalism.
Rephrase the title to more precisely reflect the setup, e.g., "ბლოგერმა ძაღლის კლავიშებზე დაჭერილი სიმბოლოებით ნეირონული ქსელით თამაში შექმნა" ("A blogger used a neural network to create a game from a dog’s key presses").
In the first paragraph, explicitly state that the dog’s input was random key presses used as a symbolic seed, while the actual design and coding were performed by the neural network guided by the human-defined context.
Add one sentence noting that the experiment is more of a playful demonstration of AI prompting than genuine game design by an animal.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.