ძაღლმა ნეირონული ქსელის გამოყენებით თამაში შექმნა. 

Detected Manipulations & Suggested Changes

Omission of key information

Leaving out relevant details that would help readers fully understand or evaluate the claims.

The article states that the neural network wrote game code based on the dog's key presses and that the author set a context for the model, but it does not specify: - What exact prompts/context were used. - What kind of game was produced or how functional it was. - Any evaluation of whether the result was coherent or mostly random. This omission does not appear deceptive, but it limits the reader’s ability to assess how meaningful the experiment’s outcome was.

3 suggestions

Add a brief description of the resulting game: its genre, basic mechanics, and whether it was playable or coherent.

Include at least one example of the prompt/context sent to the model so readers can judge how much structure came from the human vs. the dog’s key presses.

Clarify whether the author considered the result a success, partial success, or mainly a playful demonstration, and on what basis that judgment was made.

Appeal to novelty / mild sensational framing (borderline sensationalism)

Implying something is impressive or important mainly because it is new or unusual, without clearly stating its limitations.

The title and lead describe that a dog "created a game" using a neural network. While the body clarifies that the dog pressed keys and the model generated code, the framing can suggest a stronger creative role for the dog than is technically accurate. This is a mild form of novelty appeal rather than strong sensationalism.

3 suggestions

Rephrase the title to more precisely reflect the setup, e.g., "ბლოგერმა ძაღლის კლავიშებზე დაჭერილი სიმბოლოებით ნეირონული ქსელით თამაში შექმნა" ("A blogger used a neural network to create a game from a dog’s key presses").

In the first paragraph, explicitly state that the dog’s input was random key presses used as a symbolic seed, while the actual design and coding were performed by the neural network guided by the human-defined context.

Add one sentence noting that the experiment is more of a playful demonstration of AI prompting than genuine game design by an animal.