Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
England
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Presenting information in a way that emphasizes one angle (here, Pakistan’s hopes) over other equally relevant angles, which can subtly steer reader perception.
ARTICLE TITLE: "इंग्ल्यान्डले जित्दा पाकिस्तानको आशा" (England’s win and Pakistan’s hope) The title frames the match result primarily through the lens of Pakistan’s hopes, even though the content is mainly about England’s win over New Zealand and the group standings. New Zealand’s situation (missing a chance to secure a semifinal spot) is mentioned in the body but not reflected in the headline, and Sri Lanka’s role is also secondary in the framing.
Use a more neutral, multi-sided headline that reflects all key implications, for example: "इंग्ल्यान्डको जितपछि सेमिफाइनल दौडमा पाकिस्तान र न्युजिल्यान्डको आशा" (After England’s win, Pakistan and New Zealand’s semifinal hopes) or "इंग्ल्यान्डको जित, सेमिफाइनल समीकरण झन् जटिल" (England’s win makes semifinal equation more complex).
Briefly balance the framing in the first paragraph by adding a clause about New Zealand’s missed direct qualification, e.g., "न्युजिल्यान्डले यो खेल जितेको भए सेमिफाइनल पक्का हुन्थ्यो, तर इंग्ल्यान्डको जितसँगै अब पाकिस्तानको पनि आशा बाँकी छ।"
Explicitly mention in one sentence that the result affects multiple teams’ prospects (New Zealand, Pakistan, and indirectly Sri Lanka), not only Pakistan.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.