इंग्ल्यान्ड विश्वकप सेमिफाइनलमा. 

Detected Manipulations & Suggested Changes

Mild framing / emphasis (borderline omission of context)

The article emphasizes England’s success and Pakistan’s elimination situation more than exploring Pakistan’s positive aspects or broader tournament context. This is not a strong manipulation, but a slight imbalance in framing.

Phrases like: - "यस हारसँगै पाकिस्तान प्रतियोगिताबाट बाहिरिने स्थितिमा पुगेको छ।" (With this loss, Pakistan has reached a situation of exiting the tournament.) - The article gives detailed praise and statistics for Harry Brook and England’s chase, while Pakistan’s performance is described more briefly, mainly in terms of failing to reach a big score. This is still largely factual, but the narrative weight is on England’s achievement and Pakistan’s negative outcome, with less exploration of Pakistan’s strengths or chances remaining (if any).

3 suggestions

Add a brief explanation of Pakistan’s remaining mathematical chances or confirm clearly that they are fully eliminated, to avoid any ambiguity about "बाहिरिने स्थितिमा" and make the situation fully transparent.

Include one or two sentences highlighting Pakistan’s positive aspects in the match (e.g., effective overs by Salman Mirza and Mohammad Nawaz at the death, or Shaheen Shah Afridi’s key wickets) to balance the narrative focus.

Clarify the tournament context for both teams (e.g., group standings, what England and Pakistan needed from the match) so that the reader sees the result in a broader, neutral competitive frame rather than mainly as England’s success vs. Pakistan’s failure.