Beechcraft C90 Air Ambulance Lost Radar Contact 23 Minutes After Takeoff From Ranchi.

[ 24/02/2026 00:00 ] Read on timesofindia.indiatimes.com

Report Overview: The article is a short, factual incident report with neutral language, clear sourcing, and no evident bias toward any party. It mostly reports verifiable details (time, place, aircraft type, operator, number and roles of people on board, and official response). The only mild issue is a slightly broad causal implication about aviation safety investigations without supporting detail, which minimally affects objectivity.

Sides Objectivity Scores

Aviation authorities/DGCA (96)

Operator (Redbird Airways Pvt Ltd) (96)

Passengers/medical staff on board (96)

Sides Representation Balance

Favored Side

None (all sides are treated in a neutral, factual manner)

Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.

Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.

Detected Manipulations & Suggested Changes

Conflating correlation with causation / Oversimplification

Implying or hinting that one event directly causes or justifies a broader conclusion without providing evidence, or simplifying a complex issue into a single cause or effect.

The sentence: "The incident has triggered an investigation into aviation safety for medical flights." This can be read as implying that this single crash has directly led to a broader aviation safety investigation specific to medical flights, but the article does not provide detail on the scope, initiator, or prior context of such investigations. It slightly oversimplifies the relationship between the incident and systemic safety reviews.

Clarify the scope and basis of the investigation, for example: "Authorities have opened a standard accident investigation, which will also review existing aviation safety protocols for medical flights."

Avoid implying a broad systemic trigger without evidence, for example: "The incident is under investigation, including a review of safety procedures applicable to medical flights."

Attribute the claim more precisely, for example: "According to DGCA officials, the incident will be examined as part of an investigation that includes aviation safety standards for medical flights."

Spread the Truth

Share Report!

- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.