Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Wedding content creation is beneficial/necessary
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Presenting trends or attitudes in broad terms without clarifying scope, data, or variation.
1) "टिकटक र इन्स्टाग्राममा विवाहसम्बन्धी छोटा भिडियो रिल्स अपलोड गर्ने प्रवृत्ति पछिल्लो समय उल्लेखनीय रूपमा बढेको देखिन्छ ।" 2) "फोटोग्राफी र भिडियोग्राफीजस्तो औपचारिक तालिम आवश्यक नपर्ने भएकाले पनि यो पेसा युवापुस्तामाझ आकर्षक बन्दै गएको छ ।" 3) "धेरैले यसलाई अनावश्यक लगानी भनेर टिप्पणी पनि गरिरहेका छन् ।"
Add qualifiers and, where possible, data: e.g., "केही वर्षयता ... प्रवृत्ति बढेको देखिन्छ" and, if available, mention approximate figures or sources instead of just "उल्लेखनीय रूपमा".
Clarify the basis for claims about youth attraction: e.g., "केही युवाहरूका लागि यो पेसा आकर्षक बन्दै गएको छ, विशेषगरी ..." instead of implying it is broadly true for the whole youth population.
Specify the scale of criticism: e.g., "केही मानिसहरूले" or "केही समूहहरूले" instead of "धेरैले" unless backed by survey data, and mention if this is based on anecdotal observation or research.
Claims presented as fact without evidence, data, or clear sourcing.
1) "सामाजिक सञ्जालको विस्तारसँगै वैवाहिक कन्टेन्ट क्रिएसनको प्रवृत्ति नेपालमा तीव्र रूपमा बढ्दै गएको छ।" 2) "यसले विवाहलाई सम्झनायोग्य बनाउन र रमाइलो वातावरण सिर्जना गर्न सहयोग गरे पनि..." 3) "फोटोग्राफी र भिडियोग्राफीजस्तो औपचारिक तालिम आवश्यक नपर्ने भएकाले पनि यो पेसा युवापुस्तामाझ आकर्षक बन्दै गएको छ ।"
Indicate the source or nature of evidence: e.g., "केही कन्टेन्ट क्रिएटर र विवाह आयोजकहरूको अनुभवमा" or "अनलाइन प्लेटफर्मका तथ्यांक अनुसार" if such data exist.
Rephrase evaluative statements as attributed opinions: e.g., "समर्थकहरूको भनाइमा, यसले विवाहलाई सम्झनायोग्य बनाउन र रमाइलो वातावरण सिर्जना गर्न सहयोग गर्छ" instead of stating it as an objective fact.
Clarify that the attractiveness of the profession is based on observation or interviews: e.g., "उनीहरूका अनुभवमा" or "साक्षात्कारमा सहभागी युवाहरूका अनुसार".
Structuring the narrative in a way that subtly favors one interpretation or side, even without overtly biased language.
1) The "What you should know" section first emphasizes growth and benefits (making weddings memorable, fun, and providing jobs) and only then briefly notes that some see it as unnecessary or reducing originality. 2) The article ends on a positive, future-oriented note: "भविष्यमा साकुरा बस्यालजस्ता क्रिएटरहरूले यो पेसा अझ विस्तार हुने र युवाहरूका लागि सिर्जनात्मक स्वतन्त्र रोजगारीको माध्यम बन्ने आशा व्यक्त गरेका छन् ।" This closing gives the pro side the last word and a hopeful tone.
Balance the summary box by giving equal weight and neutral wording to both pros and cons, for example: one bullet on growth, one on criticisms (cost, ritual dilution), and one neutrally on employment opportunities.
Conclude with a neutral synthesis instead of a hopeful projection from one side, e.g., "समर्थक र आलोचक दुवैको धारणा रहेकाले भविष्यमा यस प्रवृत्तिको प्रभावबारे थप अध्ययन र छलफल आवश्यक देखिन्छ" or present a closing quote from both a supporter and a critic.
Explicitly signal that the future-expansion statement is the creator’s hope, not a prediction: e.g., "साकुरा बस्यालको व्यक्तिगत आशा छ कि..."
Using emotionally charged descriptions to influence readers’ attitudes rather than just inform.
1) "बुबाको भावुक अनुहार" and "रमाइलो वातावरण" emphasize emotional resonance of content. 2) Critic’s quote: "सिन्दूरको क्षण फेरि गरौं, एङ्गल राम्रो आएन’ भन्नु अस्वाभाविक लाग्छ" and "यसले विवाहलाई वास्तविक अनुभव भन्दा बढी ‘हाइलाइट रिल’ जस्तो बनाउन सक्छ" evoke discomfort and loss of authenticity.
Keep emotional elements clearly attributed as personal perceptions, as is mostly done, and avoid adopting them as the article’s own voice.
Where emotional impacts are mentioned, balance them with neutral or contrasting perspectives, e.g., after describing emotional scenes, note that for some people this may feel staged or distracting, as already partly done.
Add clarifying phrases like "उनको अनुभवमा" or "उनलाई लाग्छ" to reinforce that these are subjective views, not general truths.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.