Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
France/President Macron
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Relying on the status or position of a person (e.g., a president) as the main basis for accepting a claim, without additional evidence or perspectives.
The article is entirely based on statements by French President Emmanuel Macron: “French President Emmanuel Macron has said that both France and India want to expand cooperation on the Rafale aircraft… He said that India and France share a special global strategic partnership that is unique for both countries.” No other sources, data, or independent verification are provided.
Include additional sources beyond President Macron, such as official statements from the Indian government, defense ministry, or independent defense analysts, to corroborate or contextualize his claims.
Add factual background (e.g., previous Rafale deals, existing cooperation frameworks, timelines, contract status) so that the reader is not relying solely on Macron’s authority.
Clarify that these are Macron’s characterizations by adding phrases like “according to Macron” and contrasting them with any available independent assessments.
Presenting evaluative or broad claims as facts without supporting evidence or sufficient context, sometimes simplifying complex relationships.
The sentence: “He said that India and France share a special global strategic partnership that is unique for both countries.” The article repeats this evaluative description without explaining in what way it is “special” or “unique,” or comparing it to other partnerships either country has.
Add concrete details explaining what makes the partnership ‘special’ or ‘unique’ (e.g., scope of defense cooperation, joint exercises, technology transfer, long-term agreements).
Attribute the evaluative language clearly as Macron’s opinion and balance it with neutral wording, e.g., “Macron described the partnership as ‘special’ and ‘unique,’ citing areas such as X, Y, and Z.”
Provide brief comparative context, such as mentioning other strategic partnerships India and France maintain, to avoid implying uniqueness without evidence.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.