ECI reviews poll preparedness for forthcoming Assembly Elections in Assam.

[ 18/02/2026 22:11 ] Read on newsonair.gov.in

Report Overview: The article is short, factual, and descriptive. It reports who said what, where, and why, without evaluative language, speculation, or clear logical fallacies. There is minimal room for manipulation in such a brief, procedural report. The only mild issue is a lack of detail on differing views among political parties, which is more an omission of nuance than an active manipulation.

Sides Objectivity Scores

Election Commission of India / Chief Election Commissioner (96)

Political parties in Assam (collectively) (95)

Sides Representation Balance

Favored Side

Election Commission of India / Chief Election Commissioner

Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.

Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.

Detected Manipulations & Suggested Changes

Omission of key information

Leaving out relevant details that could provide fuller context or show diversity of views.

The article states: "Meanwhile, most of the political parties requested a single phase or a maximum of two phases of polling. The political parties also demanded that the election process be concluded before Bohag Bihu..." but does not specify: - Which parties made these requests - Whether any parties disagreed or had different demands - How the Election Commission responded to these specific requests. This omission slightly limits the reader’s understanding of the range of political positions and the Commission’s stance.

Specify which parties made these requests, for example: "Representatives from Party A, Party B, and Party C requested a single phase or a maximum of two phases of polling."

Clarify whether there were dissenting views: "However, Party D suggested that a multi-phase poll might be necessary in certain regions for security and logistical reasons."

Add the Commission’s response to these demands: "The Chief Election Commissioner noted the parties’ requests and said the Commission would take them into account while finalizing the schedule, but did not commit to a specific number of phases."

Spread the Truth

Share Report!

- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.