Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Conservation authorities / National Park officials
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Leaving out potentially relevant contextual details that could help readers fully understand the situation, even if not done with manipulative intent.
The article states that tiger counting is postponed because park staff are deployed for election duties: “निकुञ्ज कर्मचारी समेत निर्वाचन कार्यमा खटिने भएकाले बाघ गणना चुनावपछि गर्ने निर्णय भएको...” but does not explain how common this practice is, whether it affects conservation work significantly, or if there are any concerns or criticisms about using conservation staff for elections. This is a minor omission, not clearly manipulative, but additional context could improve completeness.
Add brief context on whether deploying national park staff for election duties is a standard, legally mandated practice in Nepal, or an exceptional measure.
Include, if available, any comments from independent conservation experts or NGOs on whether postponing the tiger count has any significant impact on conservation or data quality.
Clarify whether there were alternative options considered (e.g., temporary staff, rescheduling methods) and why postponement was chosen, to show the decision-making process more transparently.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.