‘उहिले २५ सय रुपैयाँ तोलामा किनेको सुनको भाउ ३ लाख नाघ्यो’.

[ 16/02/2026 20:14 ] Read on ekantipur.com

Report Overview: The article is a first‑person life story of a single villager describing his family economy, land, livestock, and local environmental risks. It is largely descriptive, with concrete numbers and no visible political or ideological agenda. There is minimal evaluative language and no clear attempt to persuade the reader of a controversial position. The only mild issue is a generalizing statement about what people in the hills need, which slightly oversimplifies broader realities. Overall, manipulative techniques are almost entirely absent.

Sides Objectivity Scores

Narrator (Kajiman Shrestha) / Rural village life (94)

Sides Representation Balance

Favored Side

Narrator (Kajiman Shrestha) / Rural village life

Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.

Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.

Detected Manipulations & Suggested Changes

Oversimplification / Hasty generalization

Presenting a complex or varied situation as if it were uniform or simple, or generalizing from one case to a broader group without sufficient evidence.

Quote: "हामी पहाडमा मान्छेलाई धेरथोक खान–लाउन पर्दैन । थोरै मात्रै श्रम गरे बेखर्ची हुनुपर्छ जस्तो मलाई लाग्दैन ।" Here, the narrator’s personal experience of relative self‑sufficiency in one village is phrased in a way that can be read as applying to people in the hills in general ("हामी पहाडमा मान्छे"), which may not reflect the diversity of economic hardship and food insecurity in other hill regions. It risks implying that with a little work, people in the hills generally do not face major expenses, which is an oversimplification.

Clarify that this is a personal experience, not a universal condition. For example: "हाम्रो गाउँतिर त पहाडमा मान्छेलाई धेरथोक खान–लाउन पर्दैन जस्तो लाग्छ" or "मेरो अनुभवमा" instead of "हामी पहाडमा मान्छेलाई".

Add a qualifier acknowledging variation: e.g., "सबै ठाउँमा यस्तै होला भन्ने होइन, तर हाम्रो गाउँमा…" to avoid implying that all hill communities share the same situation.

If space allows, briefly note that conditions can differ across regions (e.g., access to markets, remittances, land size), to avoid giving a misleadingly uniform picture of hill life.

Spread the Truth

Share Report!

- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.