39th Surajkund International Self. 

Detected Manipulations & Suggested Changes

Appeal to authority

Using the opinion or status of an authority figure as evidence for a claim, without providing independent support.

“Addressing the closing ceremony as Chief Guest, Haryana Governor Professor Asim Kumar Ghosh described the Festival as a strong and vibrant reflection of Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s vision of a self-reliant India.” The article presents the Governor’s characterization of the festival as evidence of its alignment with the Prime Minister’s vision, without any additional data or perspectives.

3 suggestions

Attribute the statement clearly as opinion and separate it from factual reporting, e.g.: “Haryana Governor Professor Asim Kumar Ghosh said he views the Festival as a reflection of Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s vision of a self-reliant India.”

Add independent context or data to support or nuance the claim, e.g.: “Organizers say the festival aims to promote self-reliance by providing a marketplace for artisans; however, no official data on its economic impact were released.”

Include other perspectives where available, e.g.: “Some participants agreed that the event helped them reach new buyers, while others said the benefits were limited to the duration of the festival.”

Unsubstantiated claims

Presenting claims as fact without evidence, data, or sourcing.

1) “The 39th Surajkund International Self-Reliance Festival concluded today with a grand and dignified ceremony…” – The terms “grand and dignified” are value judgments without supporting details. 2) “He said the festival … has played a significant role in giving international recognition to local artisans and craftspeople.” – This is a strong claim about impact, but no figures, examples, or sources are provided to substantiate the “significant role” or “international recognition.”

3 suggestions

Replace vague evaluative adjectives with concrete description, e.g.: “The 39th Surajkund International Self-Reliance Festival concluded today with a closing ceremony attended by [approximate number] participants and dignitaries.”

Qualify impact statements and add evidence, e.g.: “According to organizers, the festival aims to give international recognition to local artisans. This year, participants from X countries attended, and Y international buyers placed orders.”

Clearly attribute unverified impact claims, e.g.: “The Governor said he believes the festival has played a significant role in giving international recognition to local artisans,” instead of stating it as an established fact.

Biased / promotional language

Using positive, value-laden language that promotes a subject rather than neutrally describing it.

“grand and dignified ceremony” and “strong and vibrant reflection of Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s vision of a self-reliant India” are promotional phrases that frame the event and its political alignment in a positive light without balancing or neutral wording.

3 suggestions

Use neutral descriptors instead of promotional ones, e.g.: “The festival concluded with a closing ceremony in Surajkund, Faridabad.”

Attribute positive characterizations explicitly to speakers, e.g.: “The Governor described the festival as ‘a strong and vibrant reflection…’” rather than adopting that description as the article’s own voice.

If available, balance with neutral or varied perspectives, e.g.: “While officials praised the festival’s role in promoting self-reliance, some artisans focused on the need for year-round market access beyond the event.”

Unbalanced reporting

Presenting only one perspective or side, especially official or promotional, without alternative views or critical context.

The article only includes the Governor’s and organizers’ perspective, emphasizing alignment with the Prime Minister’s vision and the festival’s positive impact. There are no quotes or data from artisans, visitors, independent experts, or any mention of challenges, costs, or limitations.

3 suggestions

Include quotes or reactions from artisans and visitors, e.g.: “Artisan X from [state] said the festival helped increase her sales, while another artisan noted high participation costs.”

Add basic contextual information, such as attendance numbers, duration, and any logistical or economic challenges reported.

Clarify that the article is reporting on official statements rather than providing a comprehensive evaluation, e.g.: “At the ceremony, officials highlighted the festival’s role in promoting self-reliance.”

Oversimplification / narrative fallacy

Reducing a complex situation to a simple, coherent story, often aligning with a political or ideological narrative, without acknowledging complexity.

“He said the festival is inspired by the mantra ‘From Local to Global – Self-Reliant India’ and has played a significant role in giving international recognition to local artisans and craftspeople.” This frames the festival as a straightforward success story directly advancing a national self-reliance vision, without discussing any limitations, mixed outcomes, or broader economic context.

3 suggestions

Acknowledge limits and complexity, e.g.: “Officials say the festival contributes to the ‘From Local to Global’ vision by providing a platform for artisans, though comprehensive data on long-term benefits are not available.”

Provide specific, concrete examples instead of broad generalizations, e.g.: “This year, X artisans reported receiving international orders, while others said they mainly met domestic visitors.”

Avoid presenting a single political or ideological framing as the only lens; note that it is one interpretation among others.