Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Arjun Chepang / marginalized community perspective
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Use of value-laden or one-sided wording that implicitly favors one perspective.
“चेपाङ समुदाय शिक्षा, स्वास्थ्य र आर्थिक विषयमा अन्यभन्दा कमजोर छ । ‘राज्यले यो समुदायका लागि के गर्यो र? विकास र अभियान सहर केन्द्रित भए । हामी जस्ता पछाडि पारिए,’ अर्जुनले सुनाए ।” The wording presents the community as definitively “weaker than others” and implies state neglect (“राज्यले के गर्यो र?”, “हामी जस्ता पछाडि पारिए”) without any balancing context, data, or alternative views.
Attribute evaluative claims clearly and distinguish them from facts, e.g.: “अर्जुनका अनुसार, चेपाङ समुदाय शिक्षा, स्वास्थ्य र आर्थिक अवसरका हिसाबले अन्य समुदायभन्दा कमजोर अवस्थामा छ।”
Add neutral or contextual phrasing, e.g.: “उपलब्ध सरकारी तथ्यांक र स्थानीय सरोकारवालाको भनाइमा मतभेद भए पनि, अर्जुनले राज्यको ध्यान पर्याप्त नपुगेको दाबी गर्छन्।”
Avoid absolute comparative language unless supported by data, or qualify it: “कयौँ सूचकमा चेपाङ समुदाय अझै कमजोर देखिन्छ भन्ने विभिन्न अध्ययनले देखाएका छन्” (if such studies exist) or “अर्जुनलाई लाग्छ कि…”
Reducing a complex social or policy issue to a simple cause–effect narrative without nuance.
“विकास र अभियान सहर केन्द्रित भए । हामी जस्ता पछाडि पारिए।” This frames underdevelopment of the community solely as a result of city-centered development, without acknowledging other structural, geographic, historical, or policy factors, or whether any targeted programs exist.
Add nuance and indicate that this is one perspective: “अर्जुनको बुझाइमा, विकास र अभियान मुख्यतः सहर केन्द्रित भएकाले जस्ता दुर्गम समुदायहरू पछाडि परेका छन्।”
Mention complexity or limits of the claim: “तर यसबारे अन्य विश्लेषकहरूले भौगोलिक पहुँच, पूर्वाधार र ऐतिहासिक विभेदजस्ता अन्य कारण पनि देखाउँछन्।”
If possible, include brief reference to data or studies, or explicitly note lack of comprehensive data: “यस विषयमा विस्तृत तथ्यांक उपलब्ध नभए पनि, स्थानीय बासिन्दाले विकास सहरमै सीमित भएको गुनासो गर्दै आएका छन्।”
Drawing a broad conclusion about a whole group or system from limited individual experience or anecdotal evidence.
“चेपाङ समुदाय शिक्षा, स्वास्थ्य र आर्थिक विषयमा अन्यभन्दा कमजोर छ ।” The statement generalizes about the entire Chepang community’s relative status without citing any evidence or specifying scope (which region, which indicators, which time period).
Qualify the statement and attribute it: “अर्जुनले आफ्नो अनुभवका आधारमा चेपाङ समुदाय शिक्षा, स्वास्थ्य र आर्थिक अवसरमा अन्य समुदायभन्दा कमजोर रहेको बताउँछन्।”
If available, reference concrete indicators: “राष्ट्रिय जनगणना र विभिन्न अध्ययनअनुसार, चेपाङ समुदायको साक्षरता दर र स्वास्थ्य सूचक राष्ट्रिय औसतभन्दा तल छ।”
Clarify that this may not apply uniformly: “तर सबै चेपाङ बस्तीहरूमा अवस्था एउटै छैन; केही क्षेत्रमा शिक्षा र स्वास्थ्य सेवामा सुधार देखिएको छ।”
Presenting only one side’s claims or experiences on a contested issue without any other perspectives or verification.
The passage only presents Arjun’s perspective on state neglect and city-centered development: “राज्यले यो समुदायका लागि के गर्यो र? विकास र अभियान सहर केन्द्रित भए । हामी जस्ता पछाडि पारिए।” No response or context from government, experts, or data is provided.
Include a brief mention of official or alternative perspectives, even if not detailed: “यसबारे स्थानीय प्रशासनले भने दुर्गम समुदायका लागि केही लक्षित कार्यक्रम सञ्चालनमा रहेको दाबी गरेको छ।”
Clarify that only one side is being presented: “यो विषयमा राज्यका निकायहरूको धारणा यस समाचार तयार पार्दा प्राप्त हुन सकेन।”
Add neutral context: “नेपालका धेरै दुर्गम समुदायले विकास सहर केन्द्रित भएको गुनासो गर्दै आएका छन्, यद्यपि सरकारले पछिल्ला वर्षहरूमा ग्रामीण पूर्वाधारमा लगानी बढाएको दाबी गर्छ।”
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.