बुढासुब्बा गोल्डकपको फाइनल भोलि : आफैँले जित्ने दुवै टिमको दाबी . 

Detected Manipulations & Suggested Changes

Appeal to emotion / mild promotional framing

Using positive, confidence‑boosting language that can subtly promote a side rather than neutrally describe it.

Examples: - "चर्च ब्वाइज लय, आत्मविश्वास र ठूलो खेलको अनुभव भएको टिम भएकाले उच्च मनोबलका साथ प्रतिस्पर्धा गर्ने प्रशिक्षक सुमन श्रेष्ठले बताए ।" - "पछिल्ला सिजनहरूमा ‘ए’ डिभिजन लिगमा निरन्तर प्रभाव छाड्दै आएको चर्च ब्वाइजले आफूलाई दबाब झेल्न सक्ने टोलीका रूपमा स्थापित गरेको छ ।" - "भर्खरै ए डिभिजनमा उक्लिएको एन्फा उपाध्यक्ष दावा लामाको टिम प्लानिङ ब्वाइजको यात्रा योजनाबद्ध देखिएको छ ।" - "प्लानिङ ब्वाइज भावनामाभन्दा संरचनामा विश्वास गर्ने टिमको रुपमा चिनिन्छ ।" These phrases frame both teams in a positive, somewhat promotional light. While they are partly attributed to coaches or are common sports-reporting style, they still lean toward emotional/valorizing framing rather than strictly neutral description.

3 suggestions

Make clear attribution whenever evaluative language is used, e.g. "प्रशिक्षक सुमन श्रेष्ठका अनुसार चर्च ब्वाइज..." instead of stating it as a reporter’s fact.

Replace or balance value‑laden phrases with more neutral, verifiable descriptions, e.g. specify concrete results or statistics instead of "निरन्तर प्रभाव छाड्दै आएको".

Clarify when something is a general perception rather than an established fact, e.g. "धेरैको बुझाइमा प्लानिङ ब्वाइज भावनामाभन्दा संरचनामा विश्वास गर्ने टिम मानिन्छ" or provide evidence for such characterizations.

Oversimplification / lack of critical context

Presenting only the positive, confident claims of both sides without any mention of weaknesses, risks, or broader context can oversimplify the situation.

The article mainly includes confident claims from both teams: - "दुवै टिमले आफैँले जित्ने दाबी गरेका छन् ।" - "उत्कृष्ट प्रदर्शन गर्दै उपाधि जित्नेमा ढुक्क छौं ।" - "फाइनल जित्नेमा आशावादी छौं ।" - "अनुशासित संरचना र रणनीतिक खेलले परिणाम उल्ट्याउन सक्ने क्षमता आफ्नो टिममा रहेको थारुको भनाइ छ ।" There is almost no mention of tactical weaknesses, past failures (beyond a brief reference to last year’s runner‑up), or any external analysis that might complicate these optimistic self‑assessments.

3 suggestions

Include brief, neutral mention of each team’s known weaknesses or challenges (e.g., defensive lapses, inconsistency, injury list) based on past matches or expert analysis.

Add comments from independent analysts, journalists, or statistics to balance the self‑promotional quotes from coaches and captains.

Clarify that these are pre‑match claims and expectations, not guarantees, e.g. by adding phrases like "दाबी गरेका छन्", "आशा व्यक्त गरे" consistently and, where possible, contrasting with past instances where similar claims did not materialize.