Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
None (both sides are presented in a similarly positive and balanced way)
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Using positive, confidence‑boosting language that can subtly promote a side rather than neutrally describe it.
Examples: - "चर्च ब्वाइज लय, आत्मविश्वास र ठूलो खेलको अनुभव भएको टिम भएकाले उच्च मनोबलका साथ प्रतिस्पर्धा गर्ने प्रशिक्षक सुमन श्रेष्ठले बताए ।" - "पछिल्ला सिजनहरूमा ‘ए’ डिभिजन लिगमा निरन्तर प्रभाव छाड्दै आएको चर्च ब्वाइजले आफूलाई दबाब झेल्न सक्ने टोलीका रूपमा स्थापित गरेको छ ।" - "भर्खरै ए डिभिजनमा उक्लिएको एन्फा उपाध्यक्ष दावा लामाको टिम प्लानिङ ब्वाइजको यात्रा योजनाबद्ध देखिएको छ ।" - "प्लानिङ ब्वाइज भावनामाभन्दा संरचनामा विश्वास गर्ने टिमको रुपमा चिनिन्छ ।" These phrases frame both teams in a positive, somewhat promotional light. While they are partly attributed to coaches or are common sports-reporting style, they still lean toward emotional/valorizing framing rather than strictly neutral description.
Make clear attribution whenever evaluative language is used, e.g. "प्रशिक्षक सुमन श्रेष्ठका अनुसार चर्च ब्वाइज..." instead of stating it as a reporter’s fact.
Replace or balance value‑laden phrases with more neutral, verifiable descriptions, e.g. specify concrete results or statistics instead of "निरन्तर प्रभाव छाड्दै आएको".
Clarify when something is a general perception rather than an established fact, e.g. "धेरैको बुझाइमा प्लानिङ ब्वाइज भावनामाभन्दा संरचनामा विश्वास गर्ने टिम मानिन्छ" or provide evidence for such characterizations.
Presenting only the positive, confident claims of both sides without any mention of weaknesses, risks, or broader context can oversimplify the situation.
The article mainly includes confident claims from both teams: - "दुवै टिमले आफैँले जित्ने दाबी गरेका छन् ।" - "उत्कृष्ट प्रदर्शन गर्दै उपाधि जित्नेमा ढुक्क छौं ।" - "फाइनल जित्नेमा आशावादी छौं ।" - "अनुशासित संरचना र रणनीतिक खेलले परिणाम उल्ट्याउन सक्ने क्षमता आफ्नो टिममा रहेको थारुको भनाइ छ ।" There is almost no mention of tactical weaknesses, past failures (beyond a brief reference to last year’s runner‑up), or any external analysis that might complicate these optimistic self‑assessments.
Include brief, neutral mention of each team’s known weaknesses or challenges (e.g., defensive lapses, inconsistency, injury list) based on past matches or expert analysis.
Add comments from independent analysts, journalists, or statistics to balance the self‑promotional quotes from coaches and captains.
Clarify that these are pre‑match claims and expectations, not guarantees, e.g. by adding phrases like "दाबी गरेका छन्", "आशा व्यक्त गरे" consistently and, where possible, contrasting with past instances where similar claims did not materialize.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.