Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Butwal Sub-metropolitan City (positive portrayal)
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Presenting evaluative or success claims without supporting data or independent verification.
«बुटवल उपमहानगरपालिकाका प्रमुख प्रशासकीय अधिकृत मित्रमणि खनालले गत वर्षहरूमा भएका कमजोरी सुधार गर्दै अघि बढेकाले यस पटक उपमहानगरमा उत्कृष्ट बन्न सफल भएको बताए । ‘हाम्रो प्रयास देशमै उत्कृष्ट बन्ने थियो,’ उनले भने, ‘तैपनि उपमहानगरहरुमा पहिलो बन्दा खुसी नै छौँ ।’» Here, the official attributes success to improvement of past weaknesses and expresses an ambition to be the best in the country. The article does not provide comparative data, scores, or independent commentary to substantiate these evaluative claims.
Add concrete comparative data from the commission’s evaluation (e.g., numerical scores, ranking table, or specific indicator values) to support the claim that Butwal improved past weaknesses and became first among sub-metropolitan cities.
Include a brief explanation from the evaluating commission or an independent expert confirming which specific weaknesses were improved and how that affected the ranking.
Clarify that these are the official’s opinions by adding framing language such as: «खनालको दाबी अनुसार…» or «उनको भनाइमा…» and then contrast with neutral data from the evaluation report.
Relying on a single source or perspective, especially from the directly interested party, without including other relevant viewpoints.
The article quotes only the chief administrative officer of Butwal Sub-metropolitan City, who has a direct interest in portraying the result positively. There are no quotes or perspectives from the evaluation commission, other sub-metropolitan cities, or independent analysts about the ranking or methodology.
Add a quote or summary from the evaluation commission explaining why Butwal ranked first among the 11 sub-metropolitan cities and how the scoring was done.
Include at least one brief reaction from another sub-metropolitan city (for example, how they view the results or what they plan to improve) to balance the focus on Butwal.
Mention any limitations or caveats noted by the commission about the evaluation process, if available, to avoid relying solely on the beneficiary’s narrative.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.