Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Betting Operator / Promotion
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Leaving out important details that would allow a reader to fully understand the offer or context.
The text only states: "Min deposit requirement. Free Bets are paid as Bet Credits and are available for use upon settlement of bets to value of qualifying deposit. Min odds, bet and payment method exclusions apply. Returns exclude Bet Credits stake. Time limits and T&Cs apply. More Details" without specifying the actual minimum deposit, the exact odds requirements, the time limits, or linking to the full terms in this snippet.
Specify all key numerical conditions directly (e.g., minimum deposit amount, minimum odds, time window for using credits).
Include a clear, accessible reference to the full terms and conditions, not just a vague "More Details".
Clarify any restrictions (e.g., geographic, payment methods) in the same text so users can understand whether the offer applies to them.
Presenting information in a way that emphasizes potential gains or benefits while downplaying costs or risks.
The emphasis on "Free Bets" and "Bet Credits" frames the promotion as a benefit, while the limitations (min odds, exclusions, returns excluding stake) are compressed into dense legalistic language that is easy to skim past.
Present benefits and limitations with equal prominence and clarity (e.g., bullet points listing both what you get and what you do not get).
Use plain language to describe restrictions so they are as salient as the promise of "Free Bets".
Rephrase to make clear that users are risking real money and that the credits have constrained use and no direct cash value.
Using rewards or incentives to encourage action without balanced information about downsides.
The concept of "Free Bets" and credits is used as an incentive to deposit and bet, but there is no mention of gambling risks, potential losses, or responsible gambling information.
Add a clear, visible statement about the risks of gambling and the possibility of losing the deposited money.
Include responsible gambling messaging and links to support resources alongside the promotional text.
Balance the mention of rewards with a straightforward explanation of typical user costs and probabilities where possible.
Reducing a complex set of conditions to a short, vague description that can mislead about how easy or beneficial something is.
Phrases like "Min odds, bet and payment method exclusions apply" and "Time limits and T&Cs apply" compress many complex conditions into a few words, which can make the offer seem simpler and more accessible than it is.
Break out the main conditions into a short, explicit list (e.g., minimum odds, eligible markets, excluded payment methods, expiry time).
Avoid generic catch-all phrases like "T&Cs apply" without summarizing the most impactful terms.
Provide concrete examples of how the promotion works in practice (e.g., what happens if a bet wins or loses using Bet Credits).
Using a title that suggests one type of content (e.g., live cricket score coverage) but delivering unrelated or only tangentially related content.
The article title suggests live coverage of a cricket match: "SA Women vs PAK Women, 2nd T20I at Benoni... - Live Cricket Score". However, the body text is only a generic betting promotion with no scores, match details, or analysis.
Ensure the body content matches the promise of the title by including actual live score information and match details.
If the primary purpose is promotion, label it clearly as an advertisement or betting offer rather than a live score article.
Separate editorial/sports coverage from promotional content so users can distinguish between them.
Presenting only one perspective or interest while omitting others that are relevant to the context.
The content exclusively promotes the betting operator’s offer and does not provide any neutral or user-focused information (e.g., about match context, fair odds, or gambling risks).
Include neutral information about the match if the title references it (teams, time, venue, current score).
Add balanced information about the nature of betting, including risks and responsible gambling practices.
Clearly distinguish promotional language from any informational or editorial content.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.