Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Indian government/PM Modi
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Using sensational or misleading titles to attract clicks, often not supported by the actual content.
Main title: "NATO Chief's First Reaction After France Extends Hand To Russia; ‘All Members Start…’" but the body is just a list of unrelated trending video titles, with no explanation of NATO, France, or Russia. This is classic clickbait and misleading headline use. Other examples: - "Trump Aide’s PM Modi ‘Already DITCHED’ Russian Oil Shocker After India-US Trade Deal | Watch" – uses the word "Shocker" and all caps "DITCHED" to provoke curiosity and outrage without context. - "Starmer BRUTALLY GRILLED Amid Epstein Row | 'Most Gullible, Paedophile Backers, Grooming Gangs'" – emphasizes "BRUTALLY GRILLED" and inflammatory quotes to draw attention. - "Epstein Death TWIST: Did Staff Send Media After FAKE Body That Night? | WATCH" – implies a conspiracy twist without evidence in the text.
Ensure the main headline accurately reflects the content. For example: "List of Trending Videos on Politics, Crime, and Spirituality" instead of invoking NATO and France–Russia if that topic is not actually covered.
Remove exaggerated terms like "Shocker", "BRUTALLY", "TWIST" and replace them with neutral descriptions, e.g., "Trump aide claims India reduced Russian oil imports after India–US trade deal".
Avoid using ellipses and incomplete phrases like "All Members Start…" that are designed purely to trigger curiosity without information; instead, summarize the key point explicitly.
Exaggerating or dramatizing information to provoke strong emotional reactions rather than inform.
Multiple titles are framed to maximize drama: - "Starmer BRUTALLY GRILLED Amid Epstein Row | 'Most Gullible, Paedophile Backers, Grooming Gangs'" – uses "BRUTALLY" and highly charged accusations to sensationalize. - "‘They Broke My Door Down’: Detained Man Speaks Out After Release in Nancy Guthrie Case" – focuses on a dramatic quote without context. - "Rohit Shetty House Firing Case: 5 Accused Remanded Till Feb 17" – crime framing is inherently newsworthy, but without context, the emphasis is on the dramatic "house firing". - "Epstein Death TWIST: Did Staff Send Media After FAKE Body That Night?" – the word "TWIST" and suggestion of a "FAKE Body" heighten conspiracy and drama.
Replace emotionally loaded adverbs and adjectives (e.g., "BRUTALLY", "TWIST") with neutral terms like "questioned", "new development".
Provide factual context in the description instead of relying on dramatic quotes alone, e.g., mention dates, legal status, and verified information.
Avoid framing stories primarily around shock value; instead, highlight the substantive issue (e.g., legal implications, policy changes).
Using emotionally charged language or imagery to influence the audience instead of presenting balanced facts.
Examples include: - "‘They Broke My Door Down’: Detained Man Speaks Out After Release in Nancy Guthrie Case" – centers on a dramatic, fear‑inducing quote without any balancing information. - "Iran Names US, NATO Assassination Targets On Coffins In Tehran | 'Trump's Forces Can't Do Anything'" – emphasizes provocative imagery (coffins, assassination targets) and defiant quotes. - "Starmer BRUTALLY GRILLED… 'Most Gullible, Paedophile Backers, Grooming Gangs'" – uses highly emotive accusations likely to provoke anger or disgust. - "Baloch Leader Akhtar Mengal Stuns Pakistan, Says Balochistan's 'Separation Is The Only Option Now" – "Stuns" is used to dramatize and provoke a strong reaction.
Balance emotive quotes with neutral explanatory text that clarifies context, sources, and counter‑positions.
Avoid using verbs like "stuns" or "brutally" that are designed to trigger emotional responses; use neutral verbs such as "says", "criticizes", or "questions".
Include information about the broader situation (e.g., background on the Nancy Guthrie case, Iran–US tensions, Balochistan issue) so readers can evaluate the claims rationally.
Leaving out important context or reducing complex issues to simplistic, one‑sided statements.
All items are just short titles with no context. For example: - "Trump Aide’s PM Modi ‘Already DITCHED’ Russian Oil Shocker After India-US Trade Deal" – no data on actual oil import volumes, timelines, or official Indian statements. - "Iran Names US, NATO Assassination Targets On Coffins In Tehran" – no explanation of the event, its scale, official responses, or verification. - "Balochistan's 'Separation Is The Only Option Now'" – no background on Balochistan’s political situation, other viewpoints, or legal context. - "Karan Johar Moves Court, CarryMinati’s Roast Video Taken Down Amid Defamation Row" – no details on the legal grounds, statements from both parties, or court documents. This pattern encourages snap judgments based on minimal, emotionally framed information.
Accompany each title with a short, factual summary that includes who, what, when, where, and how, plus any major opposing viewpoints.
For complex geopolitical or legal issues, explicitly mention that there are multiple perspectives and briefly outline them.
Avoid presenting only the most dramatic quote or claim; include relevant data, official statements, and independent expert views.
Using words with strong positive or negative connotations that implicitly take a side.
Examples: - "Starmer BRUTALLY GRILLED" – "BRUTALLY" is a loaded intensifier that frames the interaction as humiliating or extreme. - "Most Gullible, Paedophile Backers, Grooming Gangs" – extremely loaded accusations presented in a headline without challenge or context. - "Sitharaman Exposes Rahul’s Double Standards" – "Exposes" presupposes guilt and frames the finance minister as revealing a truth, rather than simply making an accusation. - "Baloch Leader Akhtar Mengal Stuns Pakistan" – "Stuns" implies a dramatic, one‑sided reaction and elevates the impact of his statement.
Replace loaded verbs and adjectives with neutral alternatives: "questions", "criticizes", "responds to" instead of "exposes" or "brutally grills".
When quoting highly charged accusations, clearly attribute them and, where possible, indicate that they are allegations, not established facts.
Avoid evaluative language in headlines; reserve evaluation for clearly labeled opinion pieces with supporting arguments.
Presenting only one side of a controversy or relying on partisan voices without counterbalance.
The titles suggest one‑sided framings: - "KC Venugopal Defends Rahul Gandhi, Slams Govt Over India-US Deal" and "Respect One, Call Another Traitor? Sitharaman Exposes Rahul’s Double Standards" – each title highlights partisan attacks or defenses without indicating any response from the other side. - "Trump Aide’s PM Modi ‘Already DITCHED’ Russian Oil Shocker" – only the aide’s claim is foregrounded; no mention of Indian or independent verification. - "Iran Names US, NATO Assassination Targets" – only Iran’s provocative act and rhetoric are shown; no mention of US/NATO responses or international law context. Because only the most confrontational or partisan statements are surfaced, readers are nudged toward a skewed view.
Indicate in titles or subheads that other perspectives exist, e.g., "…; Govt Disputes Claim" or "…; Opposition Responds" when applicable.
In the full content (beyond titles), include quotes or data from multiple sides: government, opposition, independent experts, and affected communities.
Avoid framing stories solely around partisan attacks; include policy substance and factual background.
Framing issues as shocking controversies or fitting them into dramatic narratives even when evidence is limited.
Examples: - "Epstein Death TWIST: Did Staff Send Media After FAKE Body That Night?" – implies a major twist and possible fake body without presenting any evidence in the text; this feeds conspiracy narratives. - "Trump Aide’s PM Modi ‘Already DITCHED’ Russian Oil Shocker" – frames a policy shift (if true) as a "Shocker" rather than a policy decision with explainable reasons. - "Starmer BRUTALLY GRILLED Amid Epstein Row" – ties Starmer to the Epstein narrative in a way that emphasizes scandal and drama over substance.
Avoid suggesting conspiracies or "twists" unless there is strong, clearly presented evidence; use cautious language like "unverified claim" or "allegation" when appropriate.
Frame policy changes as policy stories, explaining motivations, data, and implications instead of as personal or dramatic shocks.
When covering scandals, separate what is confirmed from speculation, and avoid building a narrative that goes beyond the available facts.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.