Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
TimeOut ranking and featured pizzerias
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Relying on the authority or expertise of a source as primary justification, without explaining methods or limitations.
„TimeOut-მა გამოაქვეყნა პლანეტის 18 საუკეთესო პიცერიის სია. რეიტინგი შედგენილია მსოფლიოს სხვადასხვა კუთხიდან ჩამოსული მწერლებისა და რედაქტორების დახმარებით, რომლებმაც შეაფასეს მათი კერძების ხარისხი და ტრადიციული რეცეპტებისადმი მათი მიდგომა.“ The article presents TimeOut’s list as a ranking of the ‘best’ pizzerias on the planet, based on unnamed writers and editors, without any detail on criteria, sample size, or potential subjectivity. Readers are implicitly asked to accept the ranking because it comes from TimeOut and its contributors.
Clarify that the ranking reflects the subjective opinions of TimeOut’s contributors, e.g. replace „პლანეტის 18 საუკეთესო პიცერიის სია“ with „TimeOut-ის აზრით პლანეტის 18 გამორჩეული პიცერიის სია“.
Add brief information about the methodology: how many cities were considered, whether visits were anonymous, what criteria (price, consistency, service, etc.) were used.
Mention that other rankings or opinions may differ, to signal that this is one of many possible evaluations.
Leaving out relevant contextual details that would help readers better evaluate the claims.
„რეიტინგი შედგენილია მსოფლიოს სხვადასხვა კუთხიდან ჩამოსული მწერლებისა და რედაქტორების დახმარებით, რომლებმაც შეაფასეს მათი კერძების ხარისხი და ტრადიციული რეცეპტებისადმი მათი მიდგომა.“ The article does not specify how many writers/editors participated, how many pizzerias were evaluated overall, whether there were regional quotas, or how ‘quality’ and ‘approach to traditional recipes’ were operationalized. This omission slightly limits readers’ ability to assess how representative or rigorous the ranking is.
Add numbers where possible, e.g. „რეიტინგი შედგენილია X ქვეყნის Y-ზე მეტი დაწესებულების შეფასების საფუძველზე.“
Briefly describe the evaluation process (e.g. multiple visits, blind tastings, price range).
Note any limitations, such as focus on major cities or places already known to TimeOut’s network.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.