श्रीलंका टापुमा हिउँद–बर्खा ‘डर’को बास. 

Detected Manipulations & Suggested Changes

Unbalanced reporting

Presenting mainly one side’s experiences or claims without including perspectives, explanations, or data from other relevant sides.

The article quotes residents and describes their problems: - “बिजलुीको समस्या सामाधान गर्न नगरपालिका प्रमुख अशोक कार्की र वडाध्यक्ष प्रेम दाहालसित पटकपटक अनुरोध गरे पनि समाधान नभएको उनको भनाइ छ ।” - It reports repeated requests to the mayor and ward chair and states that the problem is not solved, but there is no comment or response from those officials, no mention of any plans, constraints, or official data. - Similarly, the article notes lack of students and children working in fields, but does not include the school’s or education authorities’ view, data on enrollment, or any counter‑information.

4 suggestions

Include a response or comment from नगरपालिका प्रमुख अशोक कार्की र वडाध्यक्ष प्रेम दाहाल about the electricity line and motor issue (e.g., what has been done, budget or technical constraints, future plans).

Add brief official data or verification where possible, such as number of households affected by electricity and water problems, or school enrollment figures from रामजानकी आधारभूत विद्यालय and भागलपुर मावि.

Include a short statement from school representatives or education officials about why student numbers are low and what measures (if any) are being taken, to balance residents’ claims.

Clarify whether the described problems (चापाकल सुक्ने, टेलिफोन नटिप्ने, स्वास्थ्य चौकी पुग्न गाह्रो) are documented in any local plans or reports, and if so, summarize those sources.

Omission of key information

Leaving out relevant contextual information that would help readers fully understand the situation.

The article states several problems but omits some clarifying details: - “हिउँदमा जसोतसो स्वास्थ्य चौकी पुगे पनि वर्षामा सम्भव हुँदैन ।” It does not specify distance, available alternative routes, or any emergency arrangements. - “बत्ती बाल्न मिल्ने लाइन आउँछ, न मिल चलाउन मिल्छ, न मोटर चलाउन, अनि कसरी खेतीपाती गर्नू ?” There is no technical explanation of why the line can power lights but not mills/motors (voltage, capacity, legal restrictions, etc.). - “विद्यालय परिसरमा स्थानीय गाईभैंसी चराउँछन् ।” It is not clarified whether this is due to school closure, lack of fencing, or management issues. These omissions do not appear malicious but reduce completeness and can lead readers to infer causes without full context.

4 suggestions

Specify approximate distance and travel conditions to the स्वास्थ्य चौकी in both winter and monsoon, and mention if there are any emergency transport or health outreach services.

Explain, with a brief technical or official note, why the current electricity line is insufficient for running mills and motors (e.g., low capacity, single‑phase vs three‑phase, safety regulations).

Clarify the operational status of रामजानकी आधारभूत विद्यालय (regular classes vs irregular, teacher availability) and why livestock are grazing in the school compound (e.g., lack of boundary wall, community practice, school closure times).

Mention any existing or planned projects for drinking water alternatives beyond चापाकल, if such information is available from local authorities or NGOs.