Opt out of the sale or sharing of personal information. 

Detected Manipulations & Suggested Changes

Oversimplification

Presenting a complex situation in a way that may gloss over important nuances.

“Another group took out shorter three-year mortgages in 2023, when interest rates were higher than today. These people could now see a decrease in their interest rate and monthly payment…” This frames 2023 borrowers as a relatively homogeneous group who ‘could now see a decrease’ without clarifying that this depends on individual circumstances (credit profile, lender, product type, fees, and exact timing of renewal).

2 suggestions

Clarify conditionality: “Some borrowers who took out shorter three-year mortgages in 2023, when interest rates were higher than today, could now see a decrease in their interest rate and monthly payment, depending on their specific mortgage terms and financial situation.”

Add nuance about variability: “However, outcomes will vary based on factors such as the borrower’s credit profile, the type of mortgage product, and the lender’s current offerings.”

Potential distortion / numerical inconsistency

Presenting numerical information in a way that appears inconsistent and could mislead readers about the magnitude of change.

“In the Vancouver region specifically, the delinquency rate was similar at 0.18 in the third quarter of 2025, up from a low of 0.8 per cent seen in the second half of 2022 and early 2023.” Here, the text says the rate is ‘up from a low of 0.8 per cent’ while the current figure is 0.18 per cent. If the numbers are correct as written, 0.18 is lower than 0.8, not higher. This looks like either a typo (0.08 vs 0.8) or a misstatement of the direction of change. That inconsistency can distort readers’ understanding of the trend.

3 suggestions

Correct the figures or direction explicitly: for example, “up from a low of 0.08 per cent” if that is the intended number, or “down from a high of 0.8 per cent” if the direction is reversed.

Add a brief clarification of the trend: “The rate has risen modestly from its low point but remains below historical averages.”

If uncertain, attribute carefully: “According to CMHC data, the delinquency rate was reported at 0.18 per cent in Q3 2025, compared with a reported low of 0.10 per cent in late 2022; CMHC’s regional breakdowns show small variations by period.”

Appeal to emotion (mild, reassuring)

Using emotionally charged language to influence how readers feel about the situation, even if the overall message is calming rather than alarming.

“It’s not doom and gloom. … There are options and it doesn’t have to be a terrifying experience.” This quote is clearly framed as reassurance, but it still uses emotional terms (“doom and gloom,” “terrifying”) that shape readers’ emotional response rather than just presenting facts. It is attributed to a named source, which mitigates the issue, but the language is more emotional than strictly necessary for an objective description.

2 suggestions

Rephrase in more neutral terms while keeping attribution: “Casey said that while delinquency rates are rising, they remain low by historical standards and borrowers often have options to manage higher payments.”

If keeping the quote, balance it with neutral context: “She characterized the situation as challenging but manageable for many households, rather than a crisis.”

Appeal to authority

Relying on expert opinions as evidence without always providing underlying data or acknowledging uncertainty.

Examples: - “Canada-U.S.-Mexico (CUSMA) trade negotiations could potentially affect variable rates, but TD is currently not anticipating any drastic moves by the Bank of Canada, Ng said.” - “NerdWallet’s Jarvis said he doesn’t see anything in bond yields to indicate significant movement in fixed mortgage rates in the immediate future.” These are forward‑looking statements based primarily on the authority of named experts. While this is standard in financial reporting and the experts are clearly identified, the predictions are not backed by detailed data in the text and could be interpreted as more certain than they are.

3 suggestions

Explicitly mark predictions as uncertain: “Ng said that, in his view, TD is not currently anticipating any drastic moves by the Bank of Canada, though future policy decisions remain uncertain.”

Add brief data context: “Jarvis said that, based on current bond yields and market expectations, he doesn’t see indications of significant movement in fixed mortgage rates in the immediate future.”

Where possible, link to or summarize the underlying indicators (e.g., current bond yield levels, market-implied rate paths) rather than relying solely on expert interpretation.