Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
India/Hosts
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Use of value-laden or celebratory wording that subtly promotes one side.
Phrases such as: - "The hosts extended their domination of the Championship with their gold count reaching 10 after two days of competition." - "also delivered back-to-back 1-2 finishes." - "Their combined efforts help India finish the day with a rich haul of 10 gold, five silver and one bronze medal" These phrases frame India's performance in a celebratory and somewhat promotional way, emphasizing dominance and success rather than neutrally reporting results.
Replace "extended their domination of the Championship" with a more neutral phrase such as "extended their lead in the Championship" or "continued to lead the Championship".
Replace "rich haul of 10 gold, five silver and one bronze medal" with a neutral description such as "a total of 10 gold, five silver and one bronze medals".
Avoid evaluative adjectives like "rich" and "domination" and focus on the numerical results and rankings.
Focusing heavily on one side (India) while giving minimal context or detail about others.
The article provides detailed information about Indian shooters, their names, events, and scores, while other countries are only briefly mentioned: - "ahead of Uzbekistan, who are second on the table with three gold medals." - "Kazakhstan team... a good 43 points ahead of the silver-winning Kazakhstan team." - "Kazakhstan had to settle for silver again with a score of 1627." There is no detail on individual athletes from Uzbekistan or Kazakhstan, nor broader context about their performances, which makes the coverage India-centric.
Add brief information about key athletes or performances from Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan, for example: naming top shooters or noting any close contests.
Rephrase "Kazakhstan had to settle for silver again" to a neutral form such as "Kazakhstan finished second again with a score of 1627."
Include at least one sentence summarizing the overall competition field (e.g., number of participating nations, notable performances from non-host countries) to balance the focus.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.