Madhya Pradesh to lend EVMs to Rajasthan for Local Body elections.

[ 03/02/2026 22:05 ] Read on newsonair.gov.in

Report Overview: The article is largely factual, neutral, and descriptive. It reports a specific administrative decision (lending EVMs between two state election commissions), cites named officials, and avoids emotional or partisan framing. The only mild issue is the use of positive evaluative language about the agreement (e.g., ‘strengthening inter-state cooperation’, ‘strengthens the democratic process’), which introduces a small degree of promotional tone but does not significantly distort facts.

Sides Objectivity Scores

Madhya Pradesh State Election Commission (96)

Rajasthan State Election Commission (96)

Sides Representation Balance

Favored Side

None (both sides are presented positively and symmetrically)

Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.

Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.

Detected Manipulations & Suggested Changes

Biased language / mild promotional framing

Use of value-laden, positive language that implicitly endorses an action or policy rather than describing it neutrally.

Phrases such as: - "strengthening inter-state cooperation to ensure smooth, fair, and transparent elections." - "such coordination reflects the spirit of cooperative federalism and strengthens the democratic process." These statements go beyond describing the MoU and attribute unqualified positive outcomes and normative value to it, without presenting any potential limitations, costs, or alternative views.

Replace value-laden phrasing with neutral description, for example: "...an MoU to this effect was signed today at the State Election Commission office in the Secretariat, outlining arrangements for the use of EVMs in Rajasthan’s local body elections."

Qualify evaluative claims or attribute them clearly as opinions, for example: "Officials said they expect the arrangement to facilitate inter-state cooperation and help conduct elections smoothly."

Avoid broad normative assertions like "strengthens the democratic process" unless supported by evidence or clearly attributed, e.g., "According to the Rajasthan State Election Commission, such coordination reflects the spirit of cooperative federalism and may strengthen the democratic process."

Spread the Truth

Share Report!

- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.