Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Government/Union Minister/CSIR-NIO initiative
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Using positive, aspirational language that frames the initiative in an uncritically optimistic light, without presenting uncertainties or potential downsides.
“The Union Minister hoped that the Visakhapatnam Centre would also emerge as a major hub for capacity building and skill training, nurturing young scientists, researchers, startups, and future entrepreneurs for India’s expanding marine sector.” This sentence presents a hopeful, aspirational outcome as the dominant framing of the initiative, without clarifying that these are expectations or goals rather than established facts.
Clarify that these are goals or projections, not guaranteed outcomes, for example: “The Union Minister stated that the government aims for the Visakhapatnam Centre to become a hub for capacity building and skill training…”
Add neutral qualifiers to avoid overstating certainty, e.g.: “The Centre is expected to play a role in capacity building and skill training…”
Include mention of any challenges or prerequisites (funding, infrastructure, policy support) that would need to be addressed for these hopes to materialize, to balance the optimistic framing.
Presenting only one perspective (here, the official/government view) without including any independent or alternative viewpoints.
The article only quotes or paraphrases the Union Minister and presents the initiative in a positive light. There are no comments from independent scientists, local stakeholders, environmental groups, or policy analysts about potential environmental impacts, economic feasibility, or alternative priorities.
Include comments from independent oceanographers or energy experts on the scientific and economic potential of the Eastern Coastal Margin for hydrocarbons and seabed minerals.
Add perspectives from environmental or local community representatives on possible ecological or social impacts of increased exploration and extraction.
Clarify that the article is reporting on an official event and that the statements reflect the Minister’s views, for example: “According to Dr Jitendra Singh…” and explicitly note that independent assessments were not discussed in this report.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.