Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Queenstown Lakes District Council leadership (Mayor, outgoing CEO, interim CEO)
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Relying on the status or authority of individuals or institutions to imply that a decision is correct or optimal, without providing substantive supporting evidence.
“Mayor John Glover said the appointment followed a robust process, led by Local Government New Zealand.” “The most important decision that this council will make is to appoint the substantive replacement for Mike Theelen. Michelle brings the knowledge and experience needed to lead the organisation as it faces the reforms and challenges over the coming months pending that appointment, and it is wonderful that we will have an interim who can hit the ground running,” he said.
Add brief, concrete details about what made the process ‘robust’ (e.g., number of candidates considered, criteria used, independent oversight) rather than relying solely on the mayor’s assertion and the involvement of Local Government New Zealand.
Clarify that the statements about Michelle’s suitability are the mayor’s opinions, and, if possible, supplement with factual indicators of performance (e.g., key projects led, measurable outcomes) instead of only authority-based endorsement.
Include a neutral sentence distinguishing between verifiable facts (her roles, qualifications) and evaluative judgments (that she can ‘hit the ground running’).
Using emotionally positive language to create a favorable impression rather than presenting neutral, factual description.
“...and it is wonderful that we will have an interim who can hit the ground running,” he said. “His retirement marks the end of a significant chapter for QLDC and I am sure will open a new one for Mike and his family,” he said.
Attribute emotional language clearly as personal sentiment and, where appropriate, balance it with neutral description. For example: “The mayor described the appointment as ‘wonderful’, saying he believed she could ‘hit the ground running.’”
Replace or supplement metaphorical phrasing like “marks the end of a significant chapter” with more neutral wording such as “His retirement concludes his ten-year tenure as chief executive at QLDC.”
Add a neutral summary sentence that separates the emotional tone from the factual core, e.g., “These comments reflect the mayor’s personal appreciation of Theelen’s service.”
Using consistently positive descriptors that promote a favorable view of one side without offering any neutral or critical context.
“Michelle brings the knowledge and experience needed to lead the organisation as it faces the reforms and challenges over the coming months…” “it is wonderful that we will have an interim who can hit the ground running” “it is fully evident that his commitment to public service and in particular his belief in the purpose of local government are values that he holds very dearly.”
Clarify that these are value-laden characterizations from the mayor, not established facts, e.g., “The mayor said he believed Michelle brings the knowledge and experience needed…”
Balance the positive framing with neutral context, such as noting that the article does not assess her performance or that no alternative views were sought for this brief announcement.
Where possible, replace or supplement subjective praise with specific, verifiable achievements (e.g., “She has overseen X major policy initiatives during her tenure as general manager of strategy and policy.”).
Presenting only one, uniformly positive perspective on a decision without acknowledging the absence of other viewpoints or potential concerns.
The article only includes the mayor’s positive comments about the appointment process, the interim CEO, and the outgoing CEO. There is no mention of whether there were other candidates, any debate within the council, or any public reaction, even to note that none was available at the time.
Add a brief clarifying line such as: “No other councillors or external stakeholders were immediately available for comment on the appointment.” or “The council did not disclose details of other candidates considered for the interim role.”
If relevant information exists, include whether there was any dissent or alternative views within the council regarding the appointment.
Explicitly frame the piece as a short appointment notice, e.g., “This announcement summarises the council’s decision and the mayor’s comments; it does not include independent evaluation of the appointment.”
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.