Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Chinese government / Ministry of Commerce perspective
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Presenting only one side of an issue or relying solely on one type of source, without including alternative perspectives or relevant critical information.
The entire article is based on statements from the Ministry of Commerce spokesperson and presents only positive outcomes of China's outbound investment and Belt and Road cooperation. There is no mention of any challenges, criticisms, or mixed impacts in host countries. Examples: - "Chinese enterprises' outbound investment maintained healthy, steady and orderly growth in 2025, driven by high-quality cooperation under the Belt and Road Initiative, the Ministry of Commerce said on Thursday." - "Chinese companies going global have actively fulfilled their social responsibilities... earning widespread recognition from host countries, He noted." No perspectives from host countries, independent economists, affected communities, or international organizations are included.
Include perspectives from host countries (e.g., quotes or data from local governments, businesses, workers, or civil society) that describe both benefits and any concerns or negative impacts of Chinese outbound investment.
Add comments or analysis from independent economists or international organizations (e.g., World Bank, UN agencies, think tanks) to contextualize the scale, risks, and benefits of the investments.
Mention any known challenges or controversies (e.g., debt sustainability, environmental concerns, labor issues) where relevant, and indicate how Chinese enterprises or the government address them, if at all.
Clarify that the article is reporting the ministry’s statements by adding explicit attribution throughout (e.g., "According to the ministry" or "the spokesperson claimed") and avoid presenting their perspective as the only or definitive view.
Use of value-laden or promotional wording that implicitly endorses a particular viewpoint.
Several phrases adopt the ministry’s positive framing as fact rather than as a claim: - "maintained healthy, steady and orderly growth" – these are evaluative adjectives that frame the growth as unquestionably positive and well-managed. - "driven by high-quality cooperation under the Belt and Road Initiative" – "high-quality" is a value judgment, not a neutral descriptor. - "Chinese companies going global have actively fulfilled their social responsibilities" – implies comprehensive and effective social responsibility without qualification. - "earning widespread recognition from host countries" – suggests broad approval without evidence or attribution beyond the spokesperson. These phrases go beyond neutral description of data and adopt a promotional tone aligned with the ministry’s messaging.
Replace evaluative adjectives with neutral descriptions or clearly attribute them as opinions of the spokesperson. For example: change "maintained healthy, steady and orderly growth" to "maintained steady growth" or "which the ministry described as 'healthy and orderly'."
Change "driven by high-quality cooperation under the Belt and Road Initiative" to "which the ministry attributed to cooperation under the Belt and Road Initiative" and, if needed, quote "high-quality" as the ministry’s characterization.
Rephrase "have actively fulfilled their social responsibilities" to a more neutral, evidence-based formulation such as "have undertaken various social responsibility initiatives" and, if possible, specify examples and data.
Qualify "earning widespread recognition from host countries" with attribution and evidence, e.g., "which the spokesperson said had earned recognition from some host governments" and, ideally, add concrete examples or surveys if available.
Statements presented as fact without supporting evidence, data, or verifiable sources.
Some broad, positive claims are made without supporting evidence beyond the spokesperson’s assertion: - "Chinese companies going global have actively fulfilled their social responsibilities, creating more than 2 million jobs on average each year" – the job figure is precise but lacks methodological explanation (time frame, data source, direct vs. indirect jobs). The claim about "actively fulfilled their social responsibilities" is broad and not backed by specific metrics or independent verification. - "They have financed and built numerous livelihood projects in education, healthcare and environmental protection, earning widespread recognition from host countries" – "numerous" and "widespread recognition" are vague and not supported by examples, surveys, or third-party assessments. These claims may be true but are not substantiated within the article.
Provide clear sourcing and methodology for the "more than 2 million jobs on average each year" figure (e.g., specify the years covered, whether the number comes from official statistics, independent studies, or international organizations).
Add concrete examples of social responsibility projects (e.g., specific schools, hospitals, environmental projects) with locations, dates, and, if possible, independent evaluations or host-country statements.
Qualify broad claims with attribution and scope, e.g., "The ministry said Chinese companies have financed and built projects in education, healthcare and environmental protection, which it claims have been well received in some host countries."
Where independent verification is not available, explicitly state that these are claims by the ministry rather than established facts, and avoid absolute terms like "widespread" unless supported by data.
Leaving out relevant context or information that would allow readers to fully understand the issue.
The article focuses exclusively on positive indicators (investment volume, number of enterprises, job creation, social responsibility, recognition) and omits potentially relevant contextual information: - No mention of the composition of investments (sectors, types of projects) or their distribution across regions. - No discussion of potential risks or downsides (e.g., debt concerns, environmental impacts, labor disputes, political sensitivities) that are commonly raised in international debates about outbound investment and the Belt and Road Initiative. - No comparison with previous years beyond a single growth rate, or with other major investing countries, to contextualize the claim of being "among the world's top three". This selective presentation can give readers an overly positive and incomplete picture.
Include basic contextual data such as sectoral breakdown of investments, major recipient regions, and how these patterns have changed over time.
Mention known challenges or criticisms associated with outbound investment and Belt and Road projects (e.g., debt sustainability, environmental concerns, local labor issues), even briefly, and indicate whether and how Chinese authorities or companies are addressing them.
Provide comparative data (e.g., how China’s outbound investment compares with that of the U.S., EU, or other major economies) and clarify the basis for the "top three" ranking (source, year, metric).
Clarify that the article is summarizing a ministry briefing and that it does not cover all perspectives, inviting readers to consider additional sources for a fuller picture.
Relying on the status of an authority figure or institution to support claims, without providing independent evidence.
The article relies entirely on the Ministry of Commerce spokesperson as the source of both quantitative data and evaluative judgments: - "the Ministry of Commerce said on Thursday." - "ministry spokesperson He Yongqian told a regular press conference." - "the spokesperson said" / "He noted." While ministries are legitimate sources for official statistics, the article also uses the spokesperson’s authority to support evaluative claims (e.g., "high-quality cooperation", "actively fulfilled their social responsibilities", "widespread recognition") without independent corroboration.
Distinguish clearly between verifiable statistics and evaluative or promotional statements, and label the latter explicitly as the ministry’s opinion or characterization.
Supplement ministry data with figures or assessments from independent or international sources where possible, especially for claims about social impact and recognition in host countries.
For subjective claims (e.g., "high-quality", "widespread recognition"), either provide independent evidence (surveys, third-party reports) or present them explicitly as quotes reflecting the ministry’s view, not as established fact.
Add a brief note on the nature of the event (e.g., that it was a government press conference) to remind readers that the information comes from an interested party.
Presenting information in a way that emphasizes certain aspects (usually positive or negative) to shape perception, without changing the underlying facts.
The article frames China's outbound investment exclusively in positive terms: "healthy, steady and orderly growth", "high-quality cooperation", job creation, social responsibility, and "widespread recognition". There is no mention of neutral or negative aspects, which frames outbound investment as unambiguously beneficial. This framing can influence readers’ perception even if the underlying numbers are accurate, because only positive frames are used.
Balance the positive framing with neutral descriptions and, where relevant, mention of challenges or mixed outcomes, so that readers see a more complete picture.
Use more neutral wording for growth and cooperation (e.g., "continued growth" instead of "healthy, steady and orderly growth"; "cooperation under the Belt and Road Initiative" instead of "high-quality cooperation").
Include at least brief references to debates or concerns around outbound investment and Belt and Road projects, making clear that impacts can vary by country and project.
Where the ministry uses strongly positive framing, present it as a quote and contrast it, if possible, with more neutral or independent assessments.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.