Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
None (balanced coverage of both teams)
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Using emotionally positive or motivational language that could slightly influence readers’ feelings, though here it is clearly attributed to speakers and not framed as objective fact.
1) “Good preparation for us before the World Cup. This win will give us more energy.” 2) “Hetty (Hetmyer) played a fantastic innings, but after he got out, I had to be the person finishing it,” King said. “The fielding has been a disappointment but that’s something we keep working on.” These are subjective evaluations and emotional reactions from players, but they are clearly marked as direct quotes and not endorsed by the reporter as objective assessments.
Clarify subjectivity explicitly when needed, e.g.: “Mujeeb said he felt the win was good preparation and believed it would give the team more energy.”
For evaluative terms like “fantastic innings,” keep them inside quotation marks and, if desired, add neutral context such as strike rate or comparison to other innings to anchor the opinion in data.
If aiming for maximal neutrality, the reporter could paraphrase more neutrally: “King praised Hetmyer’s innings and said he felt responsible for finishing the chase after Hetmyer was dismissed.”
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.