Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Maria Corina Machado / Venezuelan opposition
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Presenting clearly false or highly inaccurate information as established fact.
1) "Venezuelan opposition leader Maria Corina Machado, 58, who remains confident of becoming president 'when the right time comes', even as she has been sidelined by the United States following the overthrow of Nicolas Maduro, presented her Nobel Peace Prize medal to President Donald Trump on Thursday." - Maduro has not been overthrown; he remains in power in Venezuela. - Maria Corina Machado has not received a Nobel Peace Prize. 2) "Trump had strongly pushed to receive last year’s Nobel Peace Prize, citing his role in ending eight wars. However, the award was instead given to Maria Corina Machado..." - There is no record of Trump ending 'eight wars' in a way recognized by the Nobel Committee, nor of Machado receiving the prize instead. 3) "She said she was confident that Venezuela would see a smooth transition following the US overthrow of Maduro..." - Again, there has been no U.S. overthrow of Maduro. 4) "Meanwhile, Trump and acting President Delcy Rodriguez held their first phone conversation on Wednesday... She was delivering Nicolas Maduro’s state of the nation address in parliament at the time, as the long-time authoritarian leader remains jailed in New York on drug trafficking charges." - Delcy Rodríguez is not recognized as 'acting President' of Venezuela. - Nicolás Maduro is not jailed in New York; he remains in Venezuela as de facto president.
Correct all factually false claims about political status and events. For example: replace "following the overthrow of Nicolas Maduro" with an accurate description such as "amid ongoing political and economic crisis under President Nicolás Maduro".
Remove or correct the claim that Maria Corina Machado received a Nobel Peace Prize. If the piece is hypothetical or satirical, explicitly label it as such and clarify that no such award has been given.
Replace "following the US overthrow of Maduro" with a fact-based description, e.g., "following increased U.S. sanctions and diplomatic pressure on Maduro" if that is what is meant.
Correct the description of Venezuelan leadership: remove references to Delcy Rodríguez as 'acting President' and to Maduro being 'jailed in New York', and replace with accurate, sourced information about their current positions and legal status.
Verify all claims about Trump 'ending eight wars' and either provide precise, sourced details or remove the claim if it cannot be substantiated.
Assertions presented as fact without evidence, sourcing, or verifiable support.
1) "Trump had strongly pushed to receive last year’s Nobel Peace Prize, citing his role in ending eight wars." - No evidence or sourcing is provided for the specific claim of 'ending eight wars'. 2) "She said she was confident that Venezuela would see a smooth transition following the US overthrow of Maduro and that free and fair elections would ultimately be held." - The phrase "US overthrow of Maduro" is presented as a completed fact without any evidence, despite contradicting observable reality. 3) "It remains unclear whether Trump retained the medal after their White House meeting, and the Norwegian Nobel Committee has stated that the prize cannot be transferred." - The article does not provide a source for the alleged Committee statement in this specific context, nor for the claim that such a meeting and medal handover actually occurred.
Attribute controversial or surprising claims to specific, verifiable sources (e.g., official statements, reputable news outlets) and provide context or links where possible.
Qualify uncertain or speculative statements with clear language such as "alleged", "claimed by X", or "according to Y" instead of presenting them as established facts.
Remove or rephrase claims that cannot be independently verified. For example, if there is no evidence of a Nobel medal handover, state: "There is no public record of any Nobel medal being presented to Trump by Machado."
For the 'ending eight wars' claim, either provide detailed, sourced explanation of which conflicts are meant and what actions were taken, or omit the numerical claim.
A headline that implies a factual event or significance that is not supported or is misrepresented in the body of the article.
"ARTICLE TITLE: Why did Maria Machado present her Nobel Peace Prize medal to Donald Trump? She explains" - The headline presupposes that Maria Corina Machado has a Nobel Peace Prize medal and that she presented it to Trump. This is not a real, documented event and is contradicted by known facts about Nobel laureates. - The body of the article continues this false premise instead of clarifying that it is hypothetical, fictional, or satirical.
If the piece is fictional or satirical, explicitly label it as such in the headline and/or subheading, e.g., "Satire: Why did Maria Machado present her (imaginary) Nobel Peace Prize medal to Donald Trump?"
If the article aims to discuss speculation or advocacy rather than a real event, rephrase the headline to avoid stating fiction as fact, e.g., "Supporters say Maria Machado deserves a Nobel Peace Prize and praise Trump’s role".
Ensure that the headline accurately reflects verifiable events described in the article, rather than creating a dramatic but false premise.
Leaving out essential context that would allow readers to properly evaluate the claims.
1) The article never acknowledges that Maria Corina Machado is not a Nobel Peace Prize laureate, nor that there is no public record of her presenting a Nobel medal to Trump. 2) The piece refers to "the US overthrow of Maduro" without explaining when, how, or by what mechanism this supposed overthrow occurred, despite this being a major geopolitical event that would require extensive context. 3) It calls Delcy Rodríguez "acting President" and Maduro "jailed in New York" without explaining the legal or political basis for these claims, or noting that they contradict the widely reported reality that Maduro remains in power in Venezuela.
Add explicit clarification about the real-world status of the Nobel Peace Prize and its recipients, including that Machado has not received it, if the article is meant to be factual.
Provide detailed, sourced background on any claimed 'overthrow' or leadership change, including dates, actors involved, and international recognition, or remove the claim if it is not factual.
Clarify the internationally recognized positions of Maduro and Delcy Rodríguez, and if discussing alternative claims (e.g., opposition narratives), clearly label them as such and present competing perspectives.
Include a note or disclaimer if the article is speculative, fictional, or satirical, so readers are not misled into treating it as a factual report.
Word choices that implicitly favor one side or frame events in a value-laden way without supporting evidence.
1) "after making a daring escape from Venezuela by boat." - "Daring escape" is emotionally charged and frames Machado as a heroic figure without neutral description or corroboration. 2) "as the long-time authoritarian leader remains jailed in New York on drug trafficking charges." - "Authoritarian" is a strong evaluative term. While many observers describe Maduro this way, the article does not provide any context or sourcing for this characterization, and it is combined with the false claim that he is jailed in New York.
Replace emotionally loaded phrases with neutral descriptions, e.g., "after leaving Venezuela by boat" instead of "making a daring escape" unless directly quoting a source and clearly attributing it.
If using evaluative terms like "authoritarian", attribute them to specific sources (e.g., "described by human rights organizations as authoritarian") and provide context.
Separate factual description from value judgments, and ensure that any critical labels are supported by evidence and balanced with other perspectives where relevant.
Using the prestige or authority of an institution or person to lend credibility to a claim without proper evidence.
"and the Norwegian Nobel Committee has stated that the prize cannot be transferred." - The reference to the Nobel Committee is used to legitimize the narrative that a Nobel medal was presented to Trump, even though the underlying event is not established as real. The Committee’s authority is invoked without clear sourcing or context, and in a way that may make the fictional scenario seem more plausible.
Provide a direct, verifiable citation for any statement attributed to the Norwegian Nobel Committee, including date and context.
Clarify that the Committee’s general rules about non-transferability do not imply that this specific event (Machado giving Trump a medal) actually occurred, if the event is hypothetical.
Avoid using institutional names to bolster a narrative unless the institution has directly commented on the specific situation being described.
Constructing a dramatic, coherent story or conflict from events that are misrepresented or not actually connected in the way implied.
The article weaves a narrative in which: - Trump "strongly pushed" for a Nobel Peace Prize for ending "eight wars"; - The Nobel Committee instead gives the prize to Maria Corina Machado; - Machado escapes Venezuela, receives the prize, then presents the medal to Trump at the White House; - The U.S. has overthrown Maduro, who is now jailed in New York, while Delcy Rodríguez is acting president. This storyline is presented as a coherent, dramatic sequence, but it is built on multiple false premises and unverified claims. The narrative structure itself makes the scenario feel plausible and news-like, even though it does not match real-world events.
Break the narrative into clearly sourced, independently verifiable facts, and remove or clearly label any speculative or fictional elements.
Avoid implying causal chains (e.g., Trump’s push for the Nobel leading to Machado’s award and subsequent medal handover) unless there is strong evidence of such connections.
If the intent is to present an alternate-history or fictional scenario, explicitly state this at the beginning and throughout, so readers do not confuse it with factual reporting.
Presenting one side’s perspective or a particular storyline without adequately representing alternative views or basic factual corrections.
The article: - Presents Machado’s and Trump’s implied perspectives (that Trump "deserves" the Nobel, that a transition is underway after a U.S. overthrow) without any countervailing information or acknowledgment that these claims contradict widely reported facts. - Does not include any perspective from the actual Venezuelan government, international organizations, or independent experts about the status of Maduro, Delcy Rodríguez, or the political situation in Venezuela. - Does not mention that the Nobel Committee has not awarded a prize to Machado, nor that there is no public record of a medal handover to Trump.
Include factual corrections or clarifications where claims conflict with well-established information (e.g., noting that Maduro remains in power and that Machado is not a Nobel laureate).
Add perspectives from multiple stakeholders: the Venezuelan government, international observers, and independent analysts, not only opposition figures or implied U.S. viewpoints.
Clearly distinguish between what specific actors claim (e.g., "Machado says Trump deserves a Nobel") and what is independently verifiable, and present both in a balanced way.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.