Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Police/Official Sources
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Leaving out relevant contextual or follow‑up information that could help readers fully understand the situation.
1) "Reports from the St Ann police are that Linton was at her place of business..." – The article relies on police reports but does not indicate whether there are suspects, arrests, or any description of the assailant. 2) "The incident, though not a first of its nature in the vicinity, has left many residents in shock." – It mentions that similar incidents have occurred but provides no data or examples to contextualize how frequent or unusual this crime is. 3) "Since the start of the year, St Ann has recorded two murders." – This single statistic is given without comparison to previous years or to other parishes, which limits readers’ ability to gauge whether this is high, low, or typical.
Add available information on the status of the investigation, such as whether there are suspects, any description of the gunman, or appeals for information from the public, clearly noting if such details are not yet available.
Provide brief contextual data on similar incidents in the area (e.g., number of robberies or shootings near businesses in the last year) or explicitly state that detailed statistics are not available if that is the case.
When stating, "Since the start of the year, St Ann has recorded two murders," add comparative context such as, "compared to X murders in the same period last year" or note that it is too early in the year to draw conclusions about trends.
Using emotionally charged statements or quotes primarily to evoke feelings rather than to inform.
The resident quote: "Gunman come here so come rob and kill people, but right now nobody was expecting this to happen. People are scared and worried," one resident told Observer Online. This is a legitimate eyewitness/community reaction, but it emphasizes fear and worry without balancing it with any information on community responses, safety measures, or official reassurances. It slightly amplifies emotional impact relative to the limited factual context provided.
Retain the resident quote but balance it with additional factual information, such as any measures being taken by police or community groups in response to the incident.
Clarify that this is one resident’s perspective by adding context like, "One of several residents who spoke to the Observer expressed fear..." or by including a second quote with a different or more measured perspective, if available.
Ensure that emotional reactions are clearly framed as individual opinions and are secondary to the verified factual account of the incident.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.