Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Scientist (interviewee)
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Using emotionally charged or destiny-like language to frame events as special or divinely guided, which can subtly influence readers’ perceptions beyond the factual content.
The passage: "Coincidentally, the year I arrived was the same year the Cleveland Clinic was ranked the best hospital in the world. That was also when they acquired a quantum computer fully dedicated to healthcare. It felt divinely orchestrated; being at Cleveland State University gave me access to a quantum computer even before formally starting my PhD." The first two sentences are factual/chronological. The phrase "It felt divinely orchestrated" introduces a narrative of destiny or divine arrangement. While clearly presented as her feeling ("felt"), it adds an emotional, quasi-mystical framing that can make the sequence of events seem more extraordinary than necessary for an objective account.
Clarify that this is a personal interpretation and separate it more clearly from the factual sequence, for example: "Coincidentally, the year I arrived was the same year the Cleveland Clinic was ranked the best hospital in the world and acquired a quantum computer fully dedicated to healthcare. From my perspective, this timing was remarkable, as being at Cleveland State University gave me access to a quantum computer even before formally starting my PhD."
Remove the religious/destiny framing entirely if aiming for strictly neutral tone: "Coincidentally, the year I arrived was the same year the Cleveland Clinic was ranked the best hospital in the world and acquired a quantum computer fully dedicated to healthcare. Being at Cleveland State University gave me access to a quantum computer even before formally starting my PhD."
Connecting events into a coherent story of purpose or inevitability, which can overstate causality or significance compared to a more neutral chronological description.
The overall arc of the interview presents her journey as a series of turning points: the strike leading to her brother’s teaching, the discovery of quantum computing, and the timing of the Cleveland Clinic’s quantum computer. Phrases like "That was the turning point for me" and the description of events as "divinely orchestrated" help build a compelling story. While this is common and acceptable in personal narratives, it can subtly imply that these events were uniquely fated or causally linked beyond what is evidenced. Examples: - "During that period, the way he taught me science changed everything. ... That was the turning point for me." - "It felt divinely orchestrated; being at Cleveland State University gave me access to a quantum computer even before formally starting my PhD."
Rephrase to emphasize that these are her retrospective interpretations rather than objective causal laws, e.g.: "Looking back, that period significantly influenced my interest in science" instead of "changed everything" and "turning point".
Where possible, add modest qualifiers: "This experience played a major role in my decision" instead of absolute formulations like "changed everything."
If aiming for a more strictly objective style, reduce the number of strong causal/narrative connectors ("turning point", "changed everything") and stick to describing what happened and what decisions followed, without implying inevitability.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.