Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Chrystia Freeland / Liberal government
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Use of an unnamed or vaguely described source, which can limit verifiability and allow selective or convenient information to be presented without accountability.
“A source close to Freeland said Zelenskyy offered her the new unpaid, part-time position on Dec. 22, and she informed Prime Minister Mark Carney of her decision on Dec. 24.” Issues: - The source is not named or clearly identified beyond being 'close to Freeland', which can introduce bias and reduce transparency. - The information provided by this source supports Freeland’s narrative about timing and propriety, but no corroborating or contrasting source is cited.
Name the source if possible, or at least specify their role (e.g., 'a senior member of Freeland’s staff' or 'a Liberal Party official') to improve transparency.
Add corroboration from an independent or government source (e.g., confirmation from the Prime Minister’s Office) about when Carney was informed.
Explicitly note the limitation: e.g., 'CTV News has not independently verified this timeline, which comes from a source close to Freeland who was not authorized to speak publicly.'
Presenting one side’s claims or context without sufficiently detailing the other side’s reasoning or evidence, which can subtly favor one narrative.
The article briefly mentions opposition and ethics concerns but does not explore them in depth: “The timing prompted questions from opposition MPs and ethics critics who said as soon as Freeland agreed to advise another country, she should have resigned her seat in Parliament.” Only one opposition quote is provided: “‘Beyond the fact that serving Canadians is not a part-time job, the position she has accepted with a foreign government, paid or unpaid, raises the question of whose interests will be prioritized,’ said Conservative MP Michael Barrett in a social media post.” By contrast, Freeland’s and the prime minister’s positions are described with more context (her consultation with the ethics commissioner, her long-term plans, and Carney’s praise).
Include at least one detailed quote or explanation from an ethics expert or opposition MP explaining the specific ethical or legal concerns (e.g., conflict-of-interest rules, precedents).
Clarify whether any formal ethics complaint was filed or whether the ethics commissioner provided written guidance, and summarize that guidance if available.
Add a brief paragraph outlining relevant ethics rules for MPs advising foreign governments, so readers can assess the validity of both sides’ claims.
Using descriptive terms that subtly frame the situation or actors in a particular light, potentially influencing readers’ perceptions without explicit argument.
“Freeland’s resignation means her longtime seat representing the riding of University-Rosedale in downtown Toronto, will become vacant, triggering a byelection in the Liberal stronghold.” The term 'Liberal stronghold' is common political shorthand but can frame the riding as safely controlled by one party, which may: - Imply the byelection outcome is a foregone conclusion. - Understate the competitiveness or historical variation in the riding without providing data.
Add brief factual context to support the label, e.g., 'a riding the Liberals have held since its creation in 2015' or vote-share figures from recent elections.
Alternatively, use more neutral wording such as 'a riding the Liberals have consistently won in recent elections' instead of 'Liberal stronghold.'
If relevant, mention any notable past challenges or close races to give a fuller picture of electoral dynamics.
Relying on the status or authority of a person to support a position, rather than presenting substantive reasoning or evidence.
“In her post on Wednesday, Freeland said she consulted with the federal ethics commissioner and has ‘followed his advice.’” “‘Chrystia has served our country for well over a decade in a formal role as parliamentarian, certainly in a number of ministerial posts, and served with great distinction,’ he said.” These statements lean on the authority of the ethics commissioner and the prime minister’s praise to implicitly counter opposition concerns, without detailing the actual ethical analysis or criteria.
Summarize, if available, what the ethics commissioner’s advice actually entailed (e.g., 'The commissioner advised that as long as X and Y conditions were met, the role would not breach conflict-of-interest rules.').
Balance the prime minister’s praise with a neutral reminder of the controversy, e.g., 'While the prime minister praised Freeland’s service, opposition MPs maintained that...' to keep the focus on arguments rather than status.
Clarify that citing the ethics commissioner’s advice is a claim by Freeland unless independently confirmed, and indicate whether the commissioner’s office commented.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.