Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Bank of Japan / Government data perspective
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Presenting information in a way that subtly emphasizes one interpretation, and relying on institutional statements as implicitly authoritative without exploring alternatives.
1) "The underlying trend of inflation outpacing wage growth, meanwhile, has not changed, posing a challenge for the Bank of Japan, which has signalled it would continue interest rate hikes through this year." 2) "The official added that the wage environment remains unchanged overall." In (1), the article frames the situation primarily as a ‘challenge for the Bank of Japan’, focusing on the central bank’s policy dilemma rather than also explicitly noting the impact on households’ real incomes. In (2), the labour ministry official’s qualitative assessment (‘wage environment remains unchanged overall’) is reported without any counterpoint or clarification of what ‘unchanged’ means in the context of falling real wages, which can subtly privilege the official narrative.
Clarify the framing to include both policy and household impacts, for example: "The underlying trend of inflation outpacing wage growth has not changed, weighing on households’ purchasing power and posing a challenge for the Bank of Japan, which has signalled it would continue interest rate hikes through this year."
Add context or data around the official’s qualitative statement, for example: "The official added that the wage environment remains unchanged overall, referring to the pace of base salary and overtime pay increases, despite the decline in real wages due to inflation."
Include an additional, neutral perspective (e.g., from an independent economist) to balance the institutional view: "Some economists note that while nominal wages are rising, the continued fall in real wages indicates that workers’ purchasing power is still under pressure."
Leaving out potentially relevant contextual details that could help readers fully interpret the data.
The article notes: "The rise in consumer prices, however, remained high at 3.3 per cent. The inflation rate the ministry uses to calculate the headline real wage indicator includes fresh food prices but not rent costs, and it tends to be higher than the core rate." While this is transparent about the index used, it does not provide the core inflation rate or alternative measures of inflation for comparison, which would help readers understand how sensitive the real wage figure is to the chosen index.
Add the core inflation rate or a range: "By comparison, the core inflation rate (excluding fresh food) was X.X per cent in November, suggesting that the choice of index affects the exact size of the real wage decline."
Briefly explain why this particular inflation measure is used for wage calculations, to avoid any impression of selective index choice.
If available, mention whether alternative real wage measures (using different inflation indices) show similar or different trends.
Presenting data mainly from institutional or official viewpoints without including perspectives from affected groups.
The article quotes and references: the labour ministry, a labour ministry official, the Bank of Japan, and Rengo (the biggest union group). While Rengo represents workers, its mention is limited to a target figure: "The country's biggest union group, Rengo, is targeting an increase in overall pay of at least 5 per cent this year." There is no qualitative perspective from workers, households, or independent analysts on how the decline in real wages is being experienced, which slightly tilts the narrative toward institutional and policy angles.
Include a brief comment from an independent economist or research institute on the implications of 11 consecutive months of falling real wages for consumption and living standards.
Add a short, anonymized worker or household perspective (if available) to illustrate the impact of declining real wages, while keeping it factual and avoiding emotional exaggeration.
Clarify that the article focuses on official data and policy context, and explicitly note that it does not cover broader social impacts in depth, to signal the scope to readers.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.