Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Coaching candidates (Jim Schwartz, Brian Flores)
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Use of value-laden or emotionally charged wording that nudges the reader toward a particular judgment.
1) "There is arguably no worse quarterback situation in the game than theirs..." 2) "...it may take years to overhaul the dismal offensive line and wide receiver groups..." 3) "Losers of 14 out of their last 15 games, the Cardinals present quite the mess for the next head coach to walk through the door." 4) "...regressed from an already underwhelming rookie season..."
Replace "no worse quarterback situation in the game" with a more measured, comparative description, e.g., "one of the more challenging quarterback situations in the league, given..." and, if possible, reference metrics (QBR, EPA/play, contract constraints).
Change "dismal offensive line and wide receiver groups" to something like "underperforming" or "below league average" and, ideally, support with rankings (e.g., pass-block win rate, yards per route run).
Modify "present quite the mess" to a more neutral phrase such as "present a difficult situation" or "pose significant challenges for the next head coach."
Adjust "regressed from an already underwhelming rookie season" to a more specific, data-based statement, e.g., "his production declined in year two (from X to Y in key metrics), following a rookie season that fell short of typical expectations for a top-5 pick."
Assertions presented as fact without supporting evidence or clear sourcing.
1) "There is arguably no worse quarterback situation in the game than theirs..." (no comparative data or criteria given). 2) "...it may take years to overhaul the dismal offensive line and wide receiver groups, at which time likely Defensive Player of the Year Myles Garrett will be well into his 30s." (timeline and award outcome are speculative and not supported by projections or sources). 3) "Kyler Murray's time as the franchise quarterback appears to be coming to an end after another injury-plagued season..." (no reference to team statements, contract details, or credible reports indicating an imminent end). 4) "They just had no idea how to finish games." (broad, absolute characterization of team competence without evidence beyond close losses).
For the quarterback situation claim, either provide comparative metrics (e.g., ranking in passer rating, QBR, cap allocation vs. performance) or rephrase as opinion: "Many evaluators might view the Browns as having one of the more difficult quarterback situations, given..."
Qualify the Myles Garrett statement: "If the Browns need multiple offseasons to rebuild their offensive line and receiving corps, that process could overlap with the later stages of Myles Garrett's prime." Avoid stating award outcomes as settled; use "a strong candidate for Defensive Player of the Year" instead of "likely."
For Kyler Murray, add sourcing or soften the claim: "Given his recent injuries and the team's potential draft position, there is speculation that the Cardinals could move on from Murray as their long-term franchise quarterback."
Replace "They just had no idea how to finish games" with a more specific, evidence-based description: "The Cardinals struggled in late-game situations, as reflected by [e.g., their record in one-score games, fourth-quarter point differential, or late-game turnovers]."
Reducing complex situations to overly simple explanations or single causes.
1) "The biggest thing the Cardinals need is a culture reset." (implies a single primary solution to a multi-factor performance problem). 2) "They just had no idea how to finish games." (attributes close losses primarily to an abstract inability to "finish" rather than multiple tactical, personnel, or situational factors).
Rephrase "The biggest thing the Cardinals need is a culture reset" to acknowledge multiple factors: "Among several needs, including roster upgrades and schematic adjustments, a culture reset may be one of the most important for the Cardinals."
Expand "They just had no idea how to finish games" into a more nuanced explanation: "They struggled in late-game execution, including [e.g., clock management, red-zone efficiency, or defensive stops in the fourth quarter], which contributed to multiple one-score losses."
Using emotionally charged framing to influence the reader’s perception rather than relying solely on neutral analysis.
1) "As has become an unfortunate tradition in the NFL, 'Black Monday' once again saw substantial turnover..." (framing the event as "unfortunate" without exploring broader context). 2) "present quite the mess for the next head coach" (evokes a sense of chaos or dysfunction beyond the factual record).
Change "unfortunate tradition" to a neutral description: "As has become a regular occurrence in the NFL, 'Black Monday' once again saw substantial turnover..." If the author wants to argue it is unfortunate, they should briefly explain why (e.g., instability, impact on staff) with supporting reasoning.
Replace "present quite the mess" with a more neutral phrase such as "present a challenging situation" or "pose significant rebuilding tasks for the next head coach," and then specify those tasks (roster holes, cap issues, etc.).
Fitting facts into a preferred narrative (e.g., culture or "finishing games") without fully considering alternative explanations or data.
The discussion of the Cardinals leans into a narrative that the primary issue is culture and an inability to finish games, based on close losses, without examining other plausible factors such as injuries, play-calling, or roster depth: "The biggest thing the Cardinals need is a culture reset... They just had no idea how to finish games."
Acknowledge alternative explanations: "While a culture reset may help, the Cardinals' struggles in close games likely stem from a combination of factors, including injuries, depth issues, and late-game decision-making."
Include at least one data point or example that supports or challenges the "finishing games" narrative (e.g., record in one-score games, specific late-game collapses) and note that this is one interpretation among several.
Avoid presenting the culture explanation as the singular or definitive cause; frame it as a hypothesis or one of multiple contributing issues.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.