Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Quake / id Software / Bethesda
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Using reputation or status (e.g., ‘legendary’ studio) to positively frame the subject without providing supporting evidence.
Phrase: "the legendary id Software". This leans on id Software’s reputation to frame the news more positively, rather than just stating who developed the game.
Replace with neutral description: "the 1996 game from id Software".
If keeping evaluative language, add context: "the 1996 game from id Software, known for pioneering 3D shooters".
Using emotionally positive or hype-like language to make the subject seem more exciting or important than strictly warranted by the facts.
Phrases: "As one of the OG boomer shooters, Quake still commands a sizable and passionate fan base" and "it's now available on just about every gaming platform imaginable." These emphasize nostalgia and enthusiasm and slightly exaggerate reach ("just about every" and "imaginable") without precise support.
Use more precise, neutral wording: "As an early first-person shooter, Quake still has an active fan base."
Quantify or narrow the claim: "it's now available on most major gaming platforms, including [list examples]" instead of "just about every gaming platform imaginable."
Making broad claims without data or clear support.
Statement: "it's now available on just about every gaming platform imaginable." This is a broad, unverifiable claim unless platforms are listed or defined.
Specify platforms: "it's now available on PC, current consoles, and several handheld devices, including [examples]."
Qualify the statement: "it's now available on many modern gaming platforms" instead of "just about every gaming platform imaginable."
Projecting a future narrative or outcome without clear evidence, implying a trend or inevitability.
Sentence: "so it wouldn't be surprising to have those verification checkmarks start to carry more weight in 2026." This speculates about future importance of verification without citing any concrete plans or data.
Reframe as possibility, not implied likelihood: "those verification checkmarks could become more important over time, depending on adoption of SteamOS devices."
Add basis for the speculation: "Given Valve’s stated plans to expand SteamOS to more devices, those verification checkmarks may become more significant in the coming years."
Or remove speculation entirely and end with the factual information about the upcoming device: "Valve's anticipated Steam Machine is due out some time early this year."
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.