Trending Business. 

Detected Manipulations & Suggested Changes

Omission of key information

Leaving out important contextual facts that are necessary to evaluate the claims being made.

The article repeatedly promotes the benefits of local apple production and calls for government support but omits key information such as: comparative yield and quality data versus imported apples; production costs; climatic and agronomic risks; expert assessments from MoFA or agricultural scientists; and any potential downsides or constraints (e.g., water use, disease pressure, long-term viability). For example: "According to him, such support would enable Ghana to reduce its heavy dependence on imported Apples and move towards self-sufficiency, with significant benefits for the national economy." No data or expert analysis is provided to support these economic claims.

4 suggestions

Add quantitative data on yields, production costs, and current import volumes of apples, and compare them with projected local production to show whether self-sufficiency is realistic.

Include comments from independent agricultural experts or MoFA officials on the agronomic feasibility of large-scale apple cultivation in Ghana’s climate.

Discuss potential challenges (e.g., irrigation requirements, pests and diseases, climate variability, market competition) and not only the potential benefits.

Clarify that the economic benefits are projections or opinions unless backed by studies, and reference any available research or feasibility studies.

Unsubstantiated claims

Presenting assertions as facts without providing evidence, data, or credible sources.

Several statements are presented as if they are established facts but are actually claims or projections by the farmer or traders: - "According to him, such support would enable Ghana to reduce its heavy dependence on imported Apples and move towards self-sufficiency, with significant benefits for the national economy." - "Expanding local Apple production will reduce the burden on importers and greatly boost the economy." - "They noted that the high cost of imported apples—driven by shipping charges and exchange rate pressures—often pushes prices beyond the reach of many customers." These are plausible but not supported with any figures, studies, or independent verification.

4 suggestions

Attribute clearly: e.g., "According to Apostle Oduro, such support could help reduce dependence on imported apples..." and specify that these are his views or projections.

Provide data on apple import costs, retail prices, and how much of the price is due to shipping and exchange rates, citing official trade or market statistics.

Qualify economic claims with language such as "may", "could", or "is expected to" unless there is strong evidence, and reference any relevant economic analyses if available.

Include at least one independent economist or agribusiness expert’s view on whether large-scale local apple production is likely to "greatly boost the economy" or only have a modest, niche impact.

Appeal to emotion

Using emotionally charged language or framing to persuade rather than relying on evidence and balanced reasoning.

The article uses urgency and hardship framing to encourage support: - "I am appealing to the government, as a matter of urgency, to come to my aid." - "Working on this has been very difficult because Apple cultivation is not common in this climate." - Traders describe the initiative as "a major relief for traders and consumers alike" and emphasize that imported apples are "too expensive" and "beyond the reach of many customers" without data. These elements are understandable in a human-interest story but tilt the piece toward emotional persuasion rather than neutral reporting.

3 suggestions

Retain the quotes but balance them with neutral, data-based context (e.g., actual price ranges, income levels, and how many consumers are affected).

Add neutral narration that distinguishes between emotional appeals and verified facts, e.g., "While traders describe the initiative as a major relief, no comprehensive market study has yet been conducted to quantify its impact."

Avoid adopting the emotional framing in the reporter’s voice; keep emotional language inside direct quotes and use neutral wording in the narrative.

Appeal to authority / Historical analogy (borderline false analogy)

Using a respected figure or historical precedent to imply that a current initiative will have similar success, without demonstrating that the situations are comparable.

The article states: "Drawing a historical parallel, he said his ambition is to do for Apple what Tetteh Quarshie did for Cocoa in Ghana." This invokes a revered historical figure and a transformative crop to suggest that apple cultivation could have similar national significance. The analogy is not examined or qualified, and the article does not explain the major differences between cocoa’s historical role and the likely role of apples in Ghana’s economy.

3 suggestions

Clarify that this is the farmer’s personal ambition or metaphor, e.g., "He likened his ambition to that of Tetteh Quarshie’s role in cocoa, though experts note that apples are unlikely to match cocoa’s economic impact."

Include commentary from an agricultural historian or economist on why the cocoa analogy may or may not be appropriate.

Explain the scale and historical context of cocoa’s impact versus the likely niche role of apples, to prevent readers from overgeneralizing from the analogy.

Unbalanced reporting / Selective use of sources

Presenting mainly one side’s views and sources while neglecting other relevant perspectives.

The article quotes only the farmer and traders who support the initiative. It mentions that there was "widespread scepticism from experts who believed the soil and climate were unsuitable" but does not quote any of these experts, provide their reasoning, or indicate whether their views have changed. It also does not include any comment from MoFA or other policymakers, despite directly calling on them for support.

4 suggestions

Include direct quotes or summarized views from agricultural experts who were skeptical, explaining their concerns (e.g., climate suitability, disease risk, long-term viability).

Seek and include a response from the Ministry of Food and Agriculture regarding the feasibility of supporting large-scale apple cultivation and any existing policies or pilot projects.

Add perspectives from other farmers (both supportive and skeptical) to show whether this initiative is broadly seen as replicable or as a unique case.

Explicitly note if experts or MoFA declined to comment, so readers understand the limits of the reporting.

Narrative fallacy

Constructing a compelling story that implies a clear, meaningful pattern or destiny, even when evidence is limited.

The article frames Apostle Oduro as a pioneer who "defied long-held beliefs" and draws a heroic narrative arc: skepticism from experts, personal struggle, eventual success, and a potential nationwide transformation akin to cocoa. This narrative structure may lead readers to infer that large-scale success is likely or inevitable, even though only early, small-scale success is described and no systematic evidence is provided.

3 suggestions

Balance the personal success story with explicit acknowledgment of uncertainties and the early-stage nature of the project, e.g., "While his farm has achieved some local market penetration, it remains to be seen whether this can be replicated at scale."

Include data or studies, if available, on similar attempts in comparable climates and their outcomes, to ground the narrative in broader evidence.

Avoid implying inevitability or national transformation; instead, frame it as a promising but still experimental initiative.