Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
US/Trump administration
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Presenting false or impossible claims as if they were verified facts.
Entire premise: "United States President Donald Trump has posted the first picture of Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro since he was captured by US forces in an operation early on Saturday." and later: "In his second term, which began less than a year ago, Trump has twice used American forces to carry out risky operations overseas. In June 2025, he had ordered US strikes on key nuclear sites in Iran..." These statements conflict with well‑known timelines (Trump not being US president in 2025, no such capture or strikes reported by credible sources).
Verify whether any such operation or capture actually occurred using multiple independent, reputable sources before reporting it as fact.
If this is fictional or speculative, clearly label it as such (e.g., "In a hypothetical scenario" or "In a satirical piece...") instead of presenting it as real news.
Correct the timeline and roles to match reality (e.g., who is actually president, what operations have actually occurred) or remove the claims entirely if they cannot be substantiated.
Stating serious allegations or events without evidence, sourcing, or verification.
Claims such as: "Maduro would be taken to New York where he would be charged with drug trafficking and conspiracy to possess weapons against the US" and "longtime president Maduro and his wife Cilia Flores were captured by American forces and flown out of Venezuela" are presented without any sourcing, legal documentation, or corroboration. The article also asserts that Maria Corina Machado "won last year's Nobel Peace Prize" without evidence and contrary to public records.
Attribute all major claims to verifiable sources (e.g., official court documents, DOJ statements, Pentagon briefings, or multiple independent news outlets) and link or reference them.
Use conditional language when information is not yet confirmed (e.g., "US officials allege", "according to an unverified statement from...") and clearly state the level of verification.
Remove or correct claims that cannot be supported by credible, publicly verifiable evidence (e.g., the Nobel Peace Prize assertion).
A headline that presents a claim as established fact when it is unverified, false, or highly contested.
Headline: "First photo: Donald Trump releases picture of Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro after capture". It asserts as fact that Trump released such a photo and that Maduro was captured, without indicating that this is unverified, disputed, or fictional.
Qualify the headline to reflect uncertainty or dispute, e.g., "Unverified report claims Trump released photo of captured Maduro" if this is based on unconfirmed information.
If the story is fictional or satirical, clearly label it in the headline, e.g., "Satire: Trump releases photo of captured Maduro in fictional scenario".
Ensure the headline accurately reflects the level of evidence and the content of the article, avoiding definitive language for unproven claims.
Creating or amplifying a sense of international crisis or conflict based on unverified or false premises.
The article states: "several countries around the world -- including Russia and Iran -- have raised alarm over the US action and questioned its legality." This builds an image of a major international legal and diplomatic crisis around an event that is not established as real. It also references prior "US strikes on key nuclear sites in Iran" in June 2025, further escalating the sense of ongoing conflict.
Only describe international reactions that can be documented with official statements or credible reporting, and cite those sources.
Avoid building a narrative of global alarm around events that are not independently verified; clearly separate confirmed facts from speculation.
If discussing hypothetical scenarios, explicitly frame them as such and avoid implying that they have already occurred.
Using authority figures or prestigious labels to lend credibility to a narrative without factual support.
"Pro-Trump Venezuelan opposition leader Maria Corina Machado, who won last year's Nobel Peace Prize, has hailed the US strike..." The Nobel Peace Prize claim is used to boost her authority and moral standing, but it is not true according to public records. This misuses an authority label to legitimize a position.
Accurately represent the credentials and awards of individuals; remove or correct the Nobel Peace Prize claim unless it can be verified.
If highlighting her role, use verifiable descriptors (e.g., "opposition leader", "former legislator") rather than invented honors.
Avoid implying that an award or title automatically validates a political stance; focus on arguments and evidence instead.
Using dramatic, emotionally charged language or imagery to provoke strong reactions rather than inform.
Phrases like "In an audacious overnight operation" and the vivid description of Maduro "handcuffed and blindfolded as he holds a bottle of water" heighten drama. Combined with the quote "I watched it literally like I was watching a television show," the piece frames the event as a spectacle rather than a serious legal and geopolitical matter.
Replace dramatic adjectives like "audacious" with neutral descriptions (e.g., "covert", "military") and focus on verifiable details.
Describe images and operations in factual, minimal terms without unnecessary emotional or cinematic framing.
Balance any vivid description with context about legal frameworks, international law, and humanitarian implications.
Word choices that implicitly endorse or condemn a side without explicit argument or evidence.
The term "audacious overnight operation" implicitly praises the US action. The phrase "hour of freedom has arrived" is quoted without counterbalancing perspectives from Maduro supporters or neutral observers, giving more weight to one narrative. The article does not provide any framing that might question or critically examine the US action.
Use neutral descriptors for actions (e.g., "military operation" instead of "audacious operation").
Include perspectives from multiple stakeholders (e.g., Venezuelan government, international law experts, human rights organizations) and present them in similarly neutral language.
Clearly attribute value-laden phrases to speakers and balance them with alternative viewpoints or factual context.
Presenting one side’s narrative more fully or favorably than others, without proportional representation or scrutiny.
The article gives detailed space to Trump’s perspective and quote, and to the supportive reaction from Maria Corina Machado. The opposing view is reduced to a brief mention that "several countries... have raised alarm" without quoting them, explaining their legal arguments, or providing depth. Maduro’s own perspective or that of his supporters is entirely absent.
Include direct quotes or detailed summaries from critics of the operation (e.g., Russian, Iranian, or UN statements) and explain their legal or political concerns.
Provide context or statements from Maduro’s government, legal representatives, or supporters, if available.
Allocate similar depth and specificity to all major sides, or clearly state when a side could not be reached for comment.
Selecting only those details that support a particular narrative while omitting others that might complicate it.
The article highlights that "some American troops were injured in the strike but none were killed" and that Trump was told "there's no other country on Earth that could do such a manoeuvre". It omits any mention of Venezuelan casualties, civilian impact, legal basis, or international law considerations, which would be central to a balanced account of such an operation.
Include information on all casualties and impacts (US, Venezuelan military, civilians) if known, or explicitly state when such information is unavailable.
Discuss the legal justification claimed by the US and the counterarguments from other states or legal experts.
Avoid focusing solely on operational success and US capabilities; provide a fuller picture of consequences and controversies.
Constructing a coherent, dramatic story that links events in a way that may not reflect reality or evidence.
The article ties together a supposed capture of Maduro, Trump’s "second term", and earlier "US strikes on key nuclear sites in Iran" into a storyline of a bold, interventionist Trump presidency in 2025. This creates a neat narrative arc that is not supported by real-world timelines or evidence.
Treat each event as a separate, verifiable occurrence, and only connect them when there is clear, documented linkage.
Avoid building a storyline around speculative or counterfactual events; if discussing scenarios, label them as analysis or fiction.
Provide timelines and sourcing for each claimed event, allowing readers to see whether the connections are factual or interpretive.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.