Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Victims and Plaintiffs (Tempe victims, diaspora voters, subsidy-related public interest, alleged abuse victims)
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Using emotionally charged wording or emphasis to provoke feelings rather than just inform.
1) "the long-awaited proceedings over the 2023 rail disaster at Tempe that claimed 57 lives." 2) "in one of the most complex criminal cases Greece has faced in decades." 3) "The case has sparked widespread outrage and renewed scrutiny of institutional safeguards and failures to detect abuse."
Replace "long-awaited" with a more neutral temporal description, e.g., "scheduled" or "set to begin": "...the proceedings over the 2023 rail crash at Tempe, in which 57 people died."
Change "rail disaster" to a more neutral term like "rail crash" or "rail accident" if the outlet’s style guide allows: "...over the 2023 rail crash at Tempe, in which 57 people died."
Qualify or attribute the emotional reaction explicitly and, if possible, provide evidence: "The case has drawn significant public criticism and prompted official reviews of institutional safeguards and mechanisms for detecting abuse, according to [named source/survey/report]."
For "one of the most complex criminal cases Greece has faced in decades," either provide a source or rephrase more cautiously: "...a complex criminal case involving 36 defendants" or "...described by legal observers as one of the more complex criminal cases in recent decades."
Emphasizing drama or extremity to attract attention, sometimes without proportional context.
"in one of the most complex criminal cases Greece has faced in decades." This phrase elevates the case’s significance in a sweeping way without providing comparative data or attribution.
Attribute the assessment to a source: "...which some legal experts describe as one of the more complex criminal cases in recent decades."
Provide context or criteria for complexity (e.g., number of defendants, number of charges, length of investigation): "...a complex criminal case involving 36 defendants, multiple agencies, and alleged systemic failures."
If no supporting data is available, tone down the claim: "...a major criminal case involving 36 defendants."
Presenting one side’s perspective or interests more prominently than others, even if not overtly biased in language.
The article lists charges and alleged misconduct of various defendants (station masters, OSE/ERGOSE officials, politicians, party officials, a police officer) but does not mention any responses, denials, or legal positions from defense lawyers or the accused, nor does it consistently use qualifying language like "alleged" or "according to prosecutors" in every instance. Examples: - "At the center of the case is a 60-year-old station master accused of directing a passenger train onto the wrong track..." - "Sixteen executives from OSE’s technical arm, ERGOSE, including former top managers, face charges linked to delays in completing a critical signaling contract." - "Also scheduled to move forward is the case of a police officer who served at Parliament and is accused of raping his own children. The case has sparked widespread outrage..."
Systematically use legal qualifiers to emphasize presumption of innocence: "is accused of" / "faces charges of" / "according to the indictment" in every reference to alleged wrongdoing.
Where space allows, add a brief note that defendants deny the charges or have not commented, if that is factually accurate: "The defendants have denied the allegations" or "The defendants could not be reached for comment."
For the police officer case, clarify that the facts are alleged and under adjudication: "...in a case in which a police officer who served at Parliament is accused of raping his children; the allegations are being examined by the court."
If available, include at least one sentence summarizing the defense’s general position in the major cases (e.g., Tempe crash, data leak), or explicitly state that defense arguments will be presented at trial.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.