Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Likkle Miss Foundation / donors
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Use of value-laden or promotional wording that subtly frames a person or organisation in a positive or negative light rather than neutrally describing facts.
The article states that the councillor "has lauded the philanthropic efforts by the Likkle Miss Foundation" and quotes him offering "A huge thank you" and listing the donations in a very positive tone. While these are attributed quotes, the piece only includes praise and no neutral or independent framing, which can create a mildly promotional feel toward the foundation and donors.
Add a neutral introductory sentence that simply states the facts before the praise, for example: "The Likkle Miss Foundation recently donated a container house and building materials to residents in Burnt Savannah, St Elizabeth, following damage from Hurricane Melissa."
Clarify that the positive characterisations are the councillor’s opinions, not the outlet’s, for example: "In a Facebook post, Councillor Christopher Williams praised what he described as the foundation’s ‘philanthropic efforts’."
Include brief contextual information about the broader relief efforts (e.g., other organisations or government programmes assisting hurricane victims) to avoid the impression that only this foundation is acting.
Presenting only one perspective or type of information, which can unintentionally favour one side even without explicit argument.
The article focuses exclusively on the positive actions of the Likkle Miss Foundation and the councillor’s praise. It does not include any independent verification (e.g., from beneficiaries) or broader context about overall relief needs or any challenges, which makes the coverage one-sidedly positive, even though it is not overtly argumentative.
Add a short quote or paraphrased reaction from one of the beneficiaries (e.g., Miss Hopie Luton or Miss Brown) describing the impact of the assistance in neutral terms.
Provide a sentence of context about the scale of damage from Hurricane Melissa in Burnt Savannah or St Elizabeth, so readers can gauge the relative significance of this donation.
Note whether other NGOs, community groups, or government agencies are also providing similar assistance, to situate the foundation’s work within the broader relief landscape.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.