Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
None (balanced, purely factual incident report)
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Leaving out contextual information that could help readers better understand the event, even if not strictly necessary for a brief news item.
The article states: "A man whose body was found with what appeared to be gunshot wounds on a haul road in Brokenhurst, Manchester, on Monday morning has been identified." and then only provides identity, occupation, residence, and the basic timeline of discovery. There is no mention of whether police have any suspects, possible motive, or public safety guidance. For a very short breaking-news piece this is common and not clearly manipulative, but it does limit context.
Clarify that the article is an early, limited-information update, for example: "No motive has yet been established and no arrests have been made as investigations are ongoing, according to police."
If available and safe to publish, add basic context such as whether this incident fits into a broader pattern of crime in the area, while clearly distinguishing confirmed facts from ongoing investigation.
Explicitly state when information is not yet known: e.g., "Police have not yet determined a motive" or "No suspect information has been released at this time."
Use of wording that could be interpreted in more than one way, which can unintentionally mislead even if not intended as manipulation.
The sentence: "On Monday, the head of the Manchester police, Superintendent Carey Duncan, while on the scene, told journalists that residents said they heard loud explosions about 9:00 pm on Sunday." is accurate but slightly compressed. It could be clearer that the information about explosions is second-hand (from residents) and that the time is approximate.
Make the attribution and timing explicit: "Superintendent Carey Duncan, head of the Manchester police, told journalists at the scene on Monday that, according to residents, they heard what they described as loud explosions at about 9:00 pm on Sunday."
Where possible, distinguish clearly between what police directly observed and what was reported to them by residents.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.