Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Bondi businesses / local owners
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Use of dramatic or emotionally charged language to attract attention, sometimes at the expense of nuance.
1) Headline: "Bondi businesses returning to normality after mass shooting" and blurb: "the horror of the terror attack is still at the forefront of the minds of restaurant and cafe owners." The repeated use of "mass shooting", "terror attack", and "horror" in a very short description heightens emotional impact without additional context. 2) "Teen arrested in portaloo" described as "A bizarre arrest" – the word "bizarre" adds drama rather than information. 3) "The slice of heaven known as Hamilton Island" – highly romanticized description. 4) "NSW expected to pass harshest gun reforms in Australia" – "harshest" is a strong, value-laden adjective that frames the reforms negatively without explanation. 5) "Fire breaks out at popular Sydney pub" – "popular" is not necessary to convey the factual event and subtly amplifies perceived impact.
For the Bondi item, use more neutral wording: "Bondi businesses gradually reopening after recent attack; owners say the event remains on their minds."
Replace "bizarre arrest" with a factual description: "Teen arrested in portaloo" or "Teen arrested after hiding in portable toilet".
Change "The slice of heaven known as Hamilton Island" to "Hamilton Island is set to change hands as its owners offload the resort island to a private equity company in the US."
Replace "harshest gun reforms in Australia" with a more neutral phrase such as "sweeping gun reforms" or "stricter gun laws" and, in a full article, explain what makes them comparatively strict.
Remove unnecessary value-laden adjectives like "popular" unless they are supported by data (e.g., visitor numbers) and relevant to the story’s substance.
Use of words with positive or negative connotations that subtly push the reader toward a particular judgment.
1) "Government slammed for ‘over-reliance on technology’ during cyclone" – "slammed" is a pejorative verb that emphasizes conflict and criticism rather than neutrally describing the review’s findings. 2) "harshest gun reforms" – "harshest" implies excessive severity and frames the policy in a negative light. 3) "slice of heaven" – strongly positive framing of Hamilton Island, which is promotional rather than neutral. 4) "bizarre arrest" – subjective characterization of the arrest.
Change "Government slammed for ‘over-reliance on technology’ during cyclone" to "Review criticizes government’s ‘over-reliance on technology’ during cyclone" or "Review finds over-reliance on technology in government’s cyclone response."
Replace "harshest gun reforms" with "strict gun reforms" or "significant gun law changes" and provide specific details in the full article.
Change "slice of heaven" to a neutral descriptor such as "tourist destination" or simply "Hamilton Island".
Remove "bizarre" and describe the unusual aspect factually: "Teen arrested after being found in portable toilet".
Headlines that emphasize conflict, emotion, or judgment without providing balancing context, potentially skewing reader perception.
1) "Government slammed for ‘over-reliance on technology’ during cyclone" – focuses solely on the severity of criticism without indicating what the review actually found, whether the government responded, or if there were any positive aspects. 2) "NSW expected to pass harshest gun reforms in Australia" – frames the laws as extreme without explaining criteria or including perspectives from supporters and critics. 3) "Bondi businesses returning to normality after mass shooting" – compresses a complex situation into a dramatic phrase; the blurb then adds "the horror of the terror attack" without any mention of community resilience, support measures, or broader context.
For the cyclone review, use a more descriptive headline: "Review finds Queensland government relied heavily on technology for cyclone warnings" and in the article summarize both criticisms and any recommendations or government responses.
For the gun law item, use: "NSW parliament expected to pass new hate speech and gun laws after Bondi attack" and in the full piece outline key provisions and include quotes from multiple sides.
For the Bondi businesses item, use: "Bondi businesses reopen following recent attack; owners describe ongoing impact" and balance emotional impact with information on recovery efforts and support.
Presenting one angle or emotional reaction without indicating that other perspectives or contextual details exist.
1) Bondi item: "the horror of the terror attack is still at the forefront of the minds of restaurant and cafe owners" focuses solely on emotional impact. There is no mention of any positive developments (e.g., community support, safety measures, economic data) or differing experiences among businesses. 2) Cyclone Alfred item: "Government slammed for ‘over-reliance on technology’" mentions only criticism. There is no indication of the government’s response, any mitigating factors, or whether the review also noted strengths. 3) Gun reforms item: "NSW expected to pass harshest gun reforms in Australia" signals a strong policy move but does not indicate any supporting or opposing arguments, expert analysis, or data on gun violence.
For the Bondi piece, add brief balancing context: mention any government or community support programs, security changes, or comments from owners who feel differently, e.g., "While many owners say the attack is still on their minds, some report a gradual return of customers and increased visible security."
For the cyclone review, include a line about the government’s response and any recommendations: "The review recommended diversifying communication channels; the government says it is considering the findings and has outlined planned changes."
For the gun reforms, indicate that there are multiple perspectives: "Supporters say the laws will improve public safety, while critics warn of potential impacts on lawful gun owners."
Relying on emotional impact rather than evidence or explanation to shape the reader’s reaction.
1) "the horror of the terror attack is still at the forefront of the minds of restaurant and cafe owners" – emphasizes fear and horror without providing concrete details about how businesses are affected (e.g., foot traffic, revenue, safety measures). 2) "slice of heaven" – appeals to idyllic imagery rather than providing factual information about Hamilton Island. 3) "harshest gun reforms" – may trigger concern or alarm about government overreach without explaining the actual content of the reforms.
For the Bondi item, pair emotional descriptions with specific, verifiable impacts: "Owners report reduced customer numbers and increased anxiety among staff, with some saying they are considering additional security measures."
For Hamilton Island, replace emotional imagery with relevant facts: "Hamilton Island, a major Whitsundays tourist destination, is set to change hands…" and include data such as visitor numbers or economic significance if available.
For the gun reforms, describe the main provisions and cite data or expert commentary on expected effects instead of relying on a single emotionally charged adjective.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.