Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Police/Prosecution and Accused Owners (procedural focus; both are covered more than victims’ perspective)
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Use of emotionally loaded or dramatic wording that can subtly influence readers’ feelings rather than just inform.
The phrase: "another owner of the ill-fated club". Calling the club "ill-fated" adds a tragic, fate-driven connotation. It is not necessary for conveying the facts (that a fire occurred and people died) and can subtly frame the establishment as cursed or doomed, which is more narrative than factual.
Replace "ill-fated club" with neutral, factual wording such as "the club where the fire occurred".
Example revision: "The court has also remanded in judicial custody Ajay Gupta, another owner of the club where the fire occurred, as the police did not seek an extension of his custody."
Avoid adjectives that imply fate or moral judgment; stick to verifiable descriptors (date, location, nature of incident, number of casualties).
Leaving out relevant contextual information that could help readers fully understand the situation or the positions of different sides.
The article states: "The Anjuna police have registered a case against them for culpable homicide not amounting to murder and other offences." and notes that the accused fled and were deported. However, it does not mention: - Whether the accused or their legal representatives have made any statements or presented a defense. - Any preliminary findings about the cause of the fire (e.g., alleged safety violations, accidental causes, ongoing forensic investigations). This is a short procedural update, so some omission is expected, but the absence of any reference to the accused’s perspective or to the investigative status can create a one-dimensional view focused only on accusations and custody.
Add a brief note on the status of the investigation, if available, e.g.: "Police said the investigation into the cause of the fire is ongoing, including examination of safety compliance at the venue."
If available, include any public or legal statements from the accused or their lawyers, e.g.: "Lawyers for the Luthra brothers have denied wrongdoing and said they will contest the charges."
Clarify that the charges are allegations and that guilt has not been established, e.g.: "They have been booked on charges of culpable homicide not amounting to murder; the case is under investigation and no court has yet determined their guilt."
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.