Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
None (balanced between Russia / Kremlin and Azerbaijan / Aliyev administration)
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Leaving out relevant context that could affect how readers interpret the reported facts.
The article only presents the official explanations: that Aliyev has a 'busy schedule' and that Azerbaijan is not a member of the Eurasian Economic Union, and that this does not harm relations with Russia. It does not mention any broader political context, possible tensions, or alternative interpretations that might be discussed in other sources.
Add a brief neutral paragraph outlining any known recent developments in Russia–Azerbaijan relations that might be relevant to interpreting Aliyev’s absence (e.g., recent diplomatic meetings, disputes, or agreements).
Clarify that the reasons given for Aliyev’s absence are the official explanations from Azerbaijani authorities, and note explicitly that the article does not assess or verify alternative interpretations.
If available, include references to independent expert commentary or analysis, clearly labeled as opinion, to provide context without endorsing any particular narrative.
Relying on statements from authorities as sufficient proof without additional evidence or context.
The article presents the statements of Dmitry Peskov and the Azerbaijani president’s administration as the only explanation for Aliyev’s absence and for the state of Russia–Azerbaijan relations, without any corroborating evidence or independent verification.
Explicitly attribute the claims as positions of the respective offices, e.g., 'According to Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov...' and 'According to the Azerbaijani president’s administration...'.
Add a sentence noting that the article is based on official statements and that no independent confirmation of the motives behind the absence is available within the piece.
Where possible, include factual corroboration (e.g., Aliyev’s other scheduled events on those dates) or clearly state that such corroboration is not provided.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.