Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Prime Minister / BJP
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Presenting one side’s claims or perspective with little or no response or context from the other side.
The article reports the Prime Minister’s accusations against the Trinamool Congress-led state government but does not include any response, denial, or perspective from the state government or TMC. Examples: - "the Prime Minister alleged that corruption, nepotism and appeasement of the ruling dispensation have prevented development in the state." - "Mr. Modi said that the BJP had no objection to political opposition but accused the Trinamool Congress-led state government of obstructing development." - "He alleged that the Mamata Banerjee-led party is opposing the ongoing SIR exercise to save infiltrators from getting identified." These are serious allegations, but only one side’s narrative is presented, which tilts the piece toward the Prime Minister/BJP perspective.
Include a response or comment from the Trinamool Congress or the West Bengal state government to the allegations of corruption, nepotism, appeasement, and obstruction of development.
If an immediate response was not available, explicitly state that attempts were made to contact the Trinamool Congress/state government for comment and that they had not responded by the time of publication.
Provide brief contextual information about any ongoing investigations, audits, or public records related to the alleged corruption or the SIR exercise, so readers can better assess the claims.
Reporting serious allegations or assertions without evidence, data, or corroboration.
The article relays several strong accusations without any supporting evidence or indication of verification: - "corruption, nepotism and appeasement of the ruling dispensation have prevented development in the state." - "accused the Trinamool Congress-led state government of obstructing development." - "opposing the ongoing SIR exercise to save infiltrators from getting identified." These are reported as the Prime Minister’s allegations, but the article does not provide any factual basis, examples, or independent corroboration, nor does it clarify that these are political claims that have not been independently verified.
Add clarifying language such as "without providing specific evidence during the speech" or "a claim that could not be independently verified" after reporting the allegations.
Provide concrete, verifiable examples or data if available (e.g., references to specific cases, reports, or court proceedings) to support or contextualize the claims.
Clearly distinguish between factual reporting and political rhetoric by explicitly labeling these statements as allegations or campaign claims and not as established facts.
Using emotionally charged themes or language to influence readers rather than relying on neutral, factual description.
The emotional content is mainly in the quoted political rhetoric, particularly around sensitive topics like corruption and "infiltrators": - "corruption, nepotism and appeasement of the ruling dispensation have prevented development in the state." - "to save infiltrators from getting identified." While these are attributed to the Prime Minister, the article does not provide neutral context or alternative framing, which can amplify the emotional impact of the accusations, especially around the term "infiltrators," which is politically and socially charged.
Explicitly frame these as politically charged statements, for example: "In a politically charged address, the Prime Minister alleged…" to signal to readers that these are rhetorical claims.
Provide neutral context about what the "SIR exercise" is, its official purpose, and how different stakeholders view it, to reduce reliance on emotionally loaded framing.
Avoid repeating emotionally charged labels without explanation; instead, describe the underlying policy or process in neutral terms (e.g., "a government exercise to verify citizenship status" if accurate) and attribute the emotive label clearly to the speaker.
Presenting selected facts or statements while omitting relevant information that would provide a fuller picture.
The article focuses on the Prime Minister’s criticism of the state government but omits: - Any mention of the state government’s stated position on the highway projects or on the SIR exercise. - Any broader context about development indicators in West Bengal that might support or contradict the claim that development has been "prevented" by the ruling dispensation. This selective inclusion of only the Prime Minister’s critical statements, without contextual data or opposing views, can skew readers’ perception.
Add brief background on the state of infrastructure and development indicators in West Bengal (e.g., recent data on road projects, economic growth, or central–state cooperation) to contextualize the claims.
Include the state government’s or TMC’s publicly stated positions on the SIR exercise and on cooperation with central infrastructure projects, if available.
Clarify whether the highway projects are centrally funded, jointly funded, or involve state participation, to give a more complete picture of responsibilities and roles.
Presenting information in a way that emphasizes one interpretation or angle, influencing how readers perceive the issue.
The structure of the article moves from neutral reporting on infrastructure to a focus on the Prime Minister’s political accusations, without balancing frames: - The projects are framed positively ("vital connecting link", "will help to reduce travel time", "will also boost the economic growth"), all from a government-promotional angle, with no mention of potential downsides (e.g., land acquisition issues, environmental concerns) or local reactions. - The political segment frames the state government primarily through the Prime Minister’s critical lens, with no alternative framing or response. This framing can lead readers to associate development solely with the central government and obstruction solely with the state government.
Include neutral or critical perspectives on the highway projects if they exist (e.g., concerns from local residents, environmental impact assessments, or expert commentary), to balance the purely positive framing.
Reorder or clearly separate the infrastructure reporting from the political rally content, for example by using subheadings or explicit transitions that signal a shift from project details to political commentary.
Add context about cooperative or conflicting aspects of centre–state relations on infrastructure in West Bengal, so that responsibility and credit are not implicitly framed as belonging to only one side.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.