Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Advocates of kinder, less intrusive family interactions
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Drawing broad conclusions about a group or practice from limited or typical examples, presenting a complex social behavior in simplified terms.
The passage: "It is common for Filipinos to receive advice or comments about their weight, appearance, work, or personal lives from relatives during gatherings, especially after not seeing them for some time." This sentence generalizes about Filipino family reunions and implies that such comments are broadly characteristic of them, without data or nuance (e.g., variation by family, region, generation).
Add qualifiers to avoid overgeneralization, e.g.: "It is fairly common for many Filipinos to receive advice or comments about their weight, appearance, work, or personal lives from relatives during gatherings, especially after not seeing them for some time."
Mention variability and context, e.g.: "Experiences vary widely between families, but some Filipinos report receiving advice or comments about their weight, appearance, work, or personal lives from relatives during gatherings."
If available, reference data or surveys instead of relying on a blanket statement, e.g.: "In [survey/source], X% of respondents said they had received comments about their weight or personal life during family reunions."
Using emotionally charged statements or anecdotes to encourage a particular attitude or response, rather than presenting balanced evidence.
The selection and highlighting of comments such as: "Hayy, if people can just be kinder," and "Normalize this parallel universe in reunions," and "Libre lang ho maging mabuting tao" all reinforce a positive emotional framing of the comic’s message. While these are accurately quoted, the article only includes comments that support the idea of kinder reunions and does not mention any neutral or dissenting reactions, which subtly nudges readers toward one emotional stance.
Clarify that the quoted comments are examples, not a complete picture, e.g.: "Among the comments were…" or "Some users wrote…" (the article already partially does this but could be more explicit).
If such comments exist, include a brief mention of differing or neutral reactions, e.g.: "While many praised the comic, some users said they were already experiencing supportive family reunions, and others felt the portrayal was exaggerated."
Add a neutral framing sentence, e.g.: "The reactions reflect ongoing conversations about boundaries and communication in Filipino families, with different people having different experiences."
Presenting only one type of reaction or perspective, which can subtly favor one side even if no explicit argument is made.
The article only cites social media comments that agree with and reinforce the comic’s premise (wishing for kinder relatives, wanting less intrusive questions). There is no mention of people who might feel the comic exaggerates, who defend traditional questioning as caring, or who say their families are already like the "parallel universe."
Explicitly acknowledge that reactions may be varied, e.g.: "Most of the visible comments on the post were supportive of the comic’s message, though experiences of family reunions differ."
If available, add at least one contrasting or neutral comment, e.g.: "One commenter noted that their own family reunions were already supportive and non-intrusive."
Add a contextualizing line, e.g.: "The comic taps into a common theme in online discussions, but not all Filipinos relate to or agree with this portrayal of reunions."
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.