Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Government / NZ Institute for Advanced Technology initiative
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Leaving out relevant context or perspectives that would help readers fully understand the issue.
The only substantive sentence is: "Five AI concepts have been shortlisted to establish a national platform for artificial intelligence research. Science, Innovation and Technology Minister Dr Shane Reti has already announced the new platform, backed by the NZ Institute for Advanced Technology, will invest up to $70 million over seven" (cut off). There is no information on what the five concepts are, how they were selected, who benefits, potential risks, or any critical or alternative viewpoints. The rest of the page is dominated by subscription offers and site navigation.
Provide a complete description of the five shortlisted AI concepts, including their goals, selection criteria, and who evaluated them.
Include perspectives from independent experts, researchers, or civil society groups on the merits and risks of the national AI platform and the $70 million investment.
Add context on how this initiative compares to other science/technology funding priorities in New Zealand, including any trade-offs or opportunity costs.
Clarify the time frame that is cut off ("over seven" likely years) and explain the funding structure and oversight mechanisms.
Presenting mainly one side of an issue without adequately representing other relevant viewpoints.
The text only mentions the Minister and the NZ Institute for Advanced Technology in a neutral but one-sided way, with no mention of any debate, concerns, or alternative proposals: "Science, Innovation and Technology Minister Dr Shane Reti has already announced the new platform, backed by the NZ Institute for Advanced Technology, will invest up to $70 million...". No other stakeholders or critical voices are presented in the visible portion.
Quote or summarize reactions from opposition parties, academic experts, industry representatives, and public-interest or ethics groups regarding the AI platform.
Discuss any known criticisms or concerns (e.g., about governance, privacy, bias in AI, or concentration of funding) alongside the government’s rationale.
Explain whether there was a consultation process and what feedback was received, including both supportive and critical comments.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.