Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Police/Prosecution
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Use of dramatic or attention-grabbing elements that go beyond what is necessary to inform.
Headline: "შსს-მ ნარკოდანაშაულისთვის ინტერიერის დიზაინერი დააკავა - მას მიწის ქვეშ მოწყობილ, ფეშენებელური სათბურში კანაფი მოჰყავდა: დეტალები" The phrase "ფეშენებელური სათბური" (luxurious greenhouse) and the emphasis on it being underground in the headline add a dramatic, almost cinematic tone. The word "ფეშენებელური" is not supported by concrete description (materials, cost, technical sophistication) in the body; it mainly serves to make the story more striking. Also, the early mention that the accused is the husband of a former "Miss Georgia" model foregrounds a celebrity angle that is not directly relevant to the alleged crime itself.
Replace the sensational headline with a more neutral one, e.g.: "შსს-მ ნარკოდანაშაულის ბრალდებით ინტერიერის დიზაინერი დააკავა – მიწისქვეშა სათბურში კანაფის მოყვანის საქმე".
Remove or qualify the word "ფეშენებელური" unless supported by specific, verifiable details (e.g., "სპეციალურად აღჭურვილი სათბური" instead of "ფეშენებელური სათბური").
Move or de-emphasize the celebrity connection in the headline; if kept, present it later in the text as contextual information, not as a hook.
Using a person’s social or celebrity status to increase emotional impact rather than to inform.
„როგორც მოგვიანებით გახდა ცნობილი, საქმე ეხება ინტერიერის დიზაინერს, რატი რატიანს, რომელიც ცნობილი ქართველი მოდელის, ყოფილი "მის საქართველო" თამთა შედანიას მეუღლეა.“ The fact that he is an interior designer and the husband of a former "Miss Georgia" is not directly relevant to the alleged criminal conduct. It mainly serves to increase public curiosity and emotional engagement, potentially shifting focus from the legal substance to personal/celebrity aspects.
Mention the profession and family ties only if they are directly relevant to the case (e.g., if the profession is linked to how the greenhouse was built). Otherwise, omit or minimize: "დაკავებულია 1985 წელს დაბადებული რატი რატიანი".
If the spouse is mentioned, clarify why this is relevant (e.g., public interest due to prior public roles) and avoid framing it as a hook.
Avoid highlighting "ცნობილი ქართველი მოდელი" and "ყოფილი 'მის საქართველო'" unless the article analyzes media/public reaction; otherwise, it is mostly emotional/celebrity framing.
Presenting mainly one side’s claims without including other relevant perspectives or clarifications.
The article presents in detail the Interior Ministry’s version: quantities of cannabis, description of the greenhouse, and the severe legal penalties ("ითვალისწინებს სასჯელის სახით 20 წლამდე ან უვადო თავისუფლების აღკვეთას"). However, it does not: - Clarify that these are allegations and that the accused is presumed innocent until proven guilty. - Present any position from the defense or lawyer (even a simple "ბრალს არ აღიარებს" / "აღიარებს" if known). - Provide broader legal context (e.g., how such cases are usually qualified, whether the maximum penalty is typical or rare). The only attempt to get the other side is: "თუმცა, მან ამ თემაზე საუბარი არ ისურვა და კომენტარის გაკეთებისგან თავი შეიკავა." This is noted, but the overall narrative remains almost entirely from the police perspective.
Explicitly state that the information comes from the Interior Ministry and that the case is under investigation, e.g.: "შსს-ს ინფორმაციით" and "ბრალდებული უდანაშაულოდ ითვლება, სანამ სასამართლო მის დანაშაულს არ დაადგენს."
If available, include the defense’s or lawyer’s position; if not available, state that attempts were made to obtain it (not only from the spouse).
Clarify that the mentioned punishment (20 years or life) is the maximum under the law, not necessarily what will be imposed: e.g., "კანონი ასეთ დანაშაულზე 20 წლამდე ან უვადო თავისუფლების აღკვეთის შესაძლებლობას ითვალისწინებს".
Balance the detailed description of the police version with at least minimal legal context and procedural safeguards (presumption of innocence, upcoming court hearings, etc.).
Word choices that subtly frame the subject more negatively or dramatically than necessary.
Phrases like "ფარულად, მიწის სიღრმეში ჰქონდა მოწყობილი სპეციალური სათბური" are largely factual but combined with "ფეშენებელური" in the headline and the emphasis on "ფარული" and "მიწის სიღრმეში" create a slightly dramatized image of a secret, almost cinematic operation. Also, the phrase "საზოგადოებისთვის ინტერესის გათვალისწინებით" before mentioning the spouse’s refusal to comment can imply that the public is entitled to a comment from a family member, subtly pressuring or judging the refusal.
Keep neutral, technical wording: "მიწისქვეშა სათბური" instead of "ფარულად, მიწის სიღრმეში მოწყობილი" unless the secrecy itself is legally relevant and clearly explained.
Rephrase the part about the spouse to be more neutral and less normative, e.g.: "რედაქციამ კომენტარისთვის მიმართა დაკავებულის მეუღლეს, თუმცა მან კომენტარის გაკეთება არ ისურვა." without invoking "საზოგადოებისთვის ინტერესის გათვალისწინებით".
Avoid cumulative dramatic descriptors; one precise, neutral description is preferable to several evocative adjectives.
Highlighting the harshest possible legal outcome without context can make the situation appear more extreme than is typical.
„დანაშაულები... ითვალისწინებს სასჯელის სახით 20 წლამდე ან უვადო თავისუფლების აღკვეთას.“ The article mentions only the maximum possible punishment, without explaining that courts often impose lower sentences, that sentencing depends on many factors, and that no conviction has yet occurred. This can frame the case as exceptionally grave in the reader’s mind, even before trial.
Clarify that this is the maximum penalty under the law, not a predetermined sentence: "კანონი ასეთ დანაშაულზე მაქსიმუმ 20 წლამდე ან უვადო თავისუფლების აღკვეთის შესაძლებლობას ითვალისწინებს."
If possible, add context: e.g., typical sentencing ranges in similar cases or note that the court will determine the sentence if guilt is established.
Explicitly remind readers that the investigation is ongoing and no verdict has been reached.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.