Text of PM’s address at Rashtriya Ekta Diwas programme in Kevadia.

[ 31/10/2025 11:39 ] Read on pib.gov.in

Report Overview: The article contains several instances of biased language, unsubstantiated claims, and historical misattribution. It heavily criticizes the Congress party while praising the current government, leading to an unbalanced representation of political sides.

Sides Objectivity Scores

Current Government (60)

Congress Party (30)

Sides Representation Balance

Favored Side

Current Government

Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.

Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.

Detected Manipulations & Suggested Changes

Biased language

Use of language that unfairly favors one side over another.

The article uses terms like 'lame policies' and 'spineless attitude' to describe the Congress party, while using positive language for the current government.

Use neutral language when describing the actions of both the Congress party and the current government.

Avoid using derogatory terms to describe political opponents.

Unsubstantiated claims

Claims made without evidence or support.

The article claims that the Congress party was responsible for dividing the nation and that they adopted a 'slave mentality' from the British, without providing evidence.

Provide evidence or sources to support claims about the Congress party's actions and policies.

Avoid making claims that cannot be substantiated with historical evidence.

Historical misattribution

Incorrectly attributing historical events or outcomes to specific actions or individuals.

The article attributes the division of India to the Congress party's decision on 'Vande Mataram', which is a complex historical event with multiple factors.

Provide a balanced historical context that includes multiple perspectives and factors.

Avoid oversimplifying historical events to fit a particular narrative.

Unbalanced reporting

Favoring one side over another in the presentation of information.

The article predominantly praises the current government while criticizing the Congress party, without presenting counterarguments or perspectives.

Include perspectives from the Congress party or neutral sources to provide a balanced view.

Present achievements and criticisms of both sides equally.

Spread the Truth

Share Report!

- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.