Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Trump's Approach
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Using shocking or exaggerated language to provoke public interest or excitement.
Phrases like 'drugs now kill more Americans each year than every modern war combined' and 'the ISIS of the Western Hemisphere' are used to create a sense of urgency and fear.
Use factual data without hyperbolic comparisons to convey the seriousness of the drug crisis.
Avoid equating drug cartels with terrorist organizations like ISIS without providing detailed evidence.
Using language that unfairly favors one side over another.
The article uses terms like 'transnational powers' and 'shadow governments' to describe cartels, which may not accurately reflect their operations.
Use neutral language to describe the cartels and their activities.
Provide balanced descriptions that include perspectives from experts on both sides of the issue.
Making claims without providing evidence to support them.
Statements like 'every strike on a drug boat denies the enemy profit and saves lives' lack specific evidence or data to support the claim.
Provide data or studies that support the effectiveness of military strikes in reducing drug-related deaths.
Include expert opinions or reports that validate the claims made.
Leaving out important information that could provide a more balanced view.
The article does not address potential negative consequences of military action, such as escalation of violence or diplomatic tensions.
Include potential risks and criticisms of using military force against cartels.
Present counterarguments and alternative solutions to the drug crisis.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.